Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Seychelles decisions
Decisions matching the current search
La Corte Suprema de Seychelles halló incumplimiento contractual, misrepresentation y deber fiduciario en una inversión cripto ligada a un DAO no creado, y ordenó reembolso, daños, intereses y costas.
Gill v Gill (MA 193 of 2025 (Arising in CS 124 of 2022)) [2025] SCSC 135 (30 September 2025)
The Supreme Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining dealings with Parcel PR1402 pending trial, finding a serious issue to be tried and that damages would be inadequate.
Camille & Anor v Kolsch & Ors (MA 156 of 2024 (Arising in CS 07 of 2024)) [2025] SCSC 110 (27 August 2025)
The Supreme Court of Seychelles granted an interlocutory injunction restraining distribution of a deceased estate pending determination of a succession claim.
Drury v Aux Cayes Fintech Co. Ltd (MC 87 of 2024) [2025] SCSC 50 (8 April 2025)
The Supreme Court of Seychelles granted a Norwich Pharmacal order requiring the respondent to disclose information about specified crypto deposit addresses and related user accounts.
Esparon & Anor (MA 246 of 2024 (Arising in CS 92 of 2024)) [2024] SCSC 189 (19 November 2024)
The applicants failed to establish a serious issue to be tried as they cannot claim a right of way by acquisitive prescription, and did not show their property is truly enclosed to justify a right of way under Article 682. The evidence did not support the necessity for an injunction, and the balance of convenience did not favor the applicants. Therefore, the application for interlocutory injunction is dismissed.
Source excerpt
Rosebelle (Pty) Ltd & Anor v Mauritius Commercial Bank (MA 248 of 2024 (Arising in CS 93 of 2024)) [2024] SCSC 176 (18 November 2024)
The application for stay of proceedings is premature as there are no ongoing proceedings before a Judge in relation to the commandment. The Immovable Property (Judicial Sales) Act provides sufficient statutory remedies for the Applicants, including the right to object and seek postponement of sale. Therefore, the Supreme Court's equitable jurisdiction under section 6 of the Courts Act is excluded, and the application must be dismissed.
Source excerpt
Fideria v Vidot ((SCA 08/2024) [2024] (Arising in CS 30/2021) (19 August 2024)) [2024] SCCA 22 (19 August 2024)
The Appellant contributed 75% and the Respondent 25% to the acquisition and repayment of the property. The Appellant is entitled to the first option to buy out the Respondent's share, as equity and the evidence of contributions favour him. The trial judge erred in both the apportionment and in granting the first option to the Respondent.
Source excerpt
Fideria v Vidot (CS 30 of 2021) [2024] SCSC 22 (15 March 2024)
The Supreme Court of Seychelles held that a 2020 Civil Code provision did not apply retrospectively and resolved a cohabiting couple’s house dispute by equity.
Filippo v Huobi Global Limited (MA 320 of 2023) [2023] SCSC 772 (26 October 2023)
There is a serious issue to be tried regarding the alleged fraudulent transfer of the Applicant's cryptocurrency to the Respondent's platform. Damages would be inadequate to compensate the Applicant if the assets are dissipated. The balance of convenience favors the Applicant as the Respondent has control over the assets and could dispose of them, rendering any judgment nugatory.
Source excerpt
Filippo v Huobi Global Limited (MA 320/2023 (Arising in CS92/2023)) [2023] SCSC 810 (26 October 2023)
The Supreme Court of Seychelles granted an ex parte interim injunction to preserve 24.61 bitcoins allegedly traced to Huobi Global Limited pending the main suit.
Explore more
