Sign in
Seychelles Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Seychelles Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Seychelles decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Evidence law [2024] SCSC 177

Valenza v Severe Investments Pty Ltd (CS 5 of 2021)

Valenza v Severe Investments Pty Ltd (CS 5 of 2021) [2024] SCSC 177 (19 November 2024)

The Supreme Court of Seychelles dismissed an objection to producing a photocopy of a doctor's report, holding it could be authenticated under section 31(b).

  • Admissibility of documentary evidence
  • Production of photocopies
  • Authentication of exhibits
  • Evidence-law
  • Documentary-evidence
  • Photocopies
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] SCSC 3

R v Valabhji & Ors (CO 4 of 2022)

R v Valabhji & Ors (CO 4 of 2022) [2024] SCSC 3 (15 January 2024)

The Supreme Court of Seychelles held that spousal privilege under section 134(d) is limited to testimonial compulsion and does not bar use of seized marital communications.

  • Spousal privilege
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Testimonial privilege
  • Spousal-privilege
  • Marital-communications
  • Admissibility-of-evidence
Read case analysis
Evidence law [2021] SCCC 4

Onezime v Attorney General & Anor (CP 01/2021)

Onezime v Attorney General & Anor (CP 01/2021) [2021] SCCC 4 (7 September 2021)

The petitioner's affidavit, sworn in Kenya, a non-party to the Apostille Convention, was not authenticated in accordance with section 28 of the Evidence Act and is therefore inadmissible in Seychelles courts. English law does not override the specific provisions of Seychelles law on this issue.

  • Admissibility of foreign affidavits
  • Apostille convention
  • Authentication of documents
  • Jurisdictional procedure
Read case analysis
Company law [2021] SCSC 550

Iliescu v Petrescu (MC 101 of 2019)

Iliescu v Petrescu (MC 101 of 2019) [2021] SCSC 550 (25 August 2021)

The Petitioner proved on a balance of probabilities that the Change of Beneficial Owner's Declaration was a forgery and that he remained the beneficial owner of GBG. The Respondent failed to prove any investment or entitlement. The Registered Agent acted without proper instructions. The transfer and subsequent changes are null and void. The register must be rectified to restore the Petitioner as beneficial owner.

  • Beneficial ownership
  • Forgery
  • Nominee shareholding
  • Rectification of register
  • Expert evidence
  • International business companies
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2021] SCSC 875

R v Geers & Ors (CO 27/2017)

R v Geers & Ors (CO 27/2017) [2021] SCSC 875 (13 April 2021)

The Supreme Court of Seychelles held that the accused’s verbal admission to police was admissible because it was spontaneous, voluntary, and not induced.

  • Admissibility of confessions
  • Hearsay
  • Constitutional rights of accused
  • Confession-admissibility
  • Criminal-evidence
  • Voluntariness-of-confession
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2020] SCSC 666

R v Geers (CO 27/2017)

R v Geers (CO 27/2017) [2020] SCSC 666 (17 December 2020)

Ruling on a voir dire in a criminal case, the court admitted the accused’s verbal confession after finding it voluntary and properly cautioned.

  • Admissibility of confession
  • Voluntariness of confession
  • Constitutional rights of accused
  • Hearsay
  • Judge's rules
  • Confession-admissibility
Read case analysis
Tort law [2019] SCCA 6

John Marengo & Ors v Fred anderson (SCA 9 of 2016)

John Marengo & Ors v Fred anderson (SCA 9 of 2016) [2019] SCCA 6 (9 May 2019)

The Court of Appeal dismissed a second appeal over contaminated fuel, upholding findings that the respondent proved the claim and that the receipts were admissible.

  • Burden of proof
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Damages for delict
  • Assessment of factual findings
  • Burden-of-proof
  • Admissibility-of-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2018] SCSC 8230

R v Casime & Ano (CO 72/2017)

R v Casime & Ano (CO 72/2017) [2018] SCSC 8230 (23 July 2018)

There is no ambush or prejudice as the content of the pen drives is already in evidence via P17, but the defence must be given an opportunity to view the pen drives to ensure their content matches P17, upholding the right to a fair hearing.

  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Disclosure
  • Fair trial
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2018] SCSC 8207

R v Mondon & Ors (CO 44/2017)

R v Mondon & Ors (CO 44/2017) [2018] SCSC 8207 (8 July 2018)

The Supreme Court of Seychelles held that communications between an accused and a lawyer visiting him in custody were protected by legal professional privilege and could not be compelled.

  • Legal professional privilege
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Client-lawyer confidentiality
  • Legal-professional-privilege
  • Admissibility-of-evidence
  • Client-lawyer-confidentiality
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] SCSC 921

R v Baker & Anor (CO 46/2011)

R v Baker & Anor (CO 46/2011) [2017] SCSC 921 (16 September 2017)

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the statement of the 2nd accused was made voluntarily and without inducement; unresolved contradictions in prosecution evidence and credible allegations by the accused required the court to resolve doubt in favour of the accused.

  • Admissibility of confessions
  • Voluntariness of statements
  • Inducement
  • Constitutional rights of accused
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Seychelles decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.