Sign in
Seychelles Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Seychelles Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Seychelles decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional law [2016] SCCA 10

Moulinie v Government of Seychelles & Ors (SCA 40 of 2013)

Moulinie v Government of Seychelles & Ors (SCA 40 of 2013) [2016] SCCA 10 (22 April 2016)

Court of Appeal held that compensation for unreturned land had to be assessed at current market value, not 1993 value, and allowed the appeal.

  • Compulsory acquisition
  • Compensation for land
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Right to property
  • Compulsory-acquisition
  • Land-compensation
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2012] SCCA 10

Michel & Ors v Dhanjee & Ors (SCA 5 of 2012)

Michel & Ors v Dhanjee & Ors (SCA 5 of 2012) [2012] SCCA 10 (31 August 2012)

The majority held that the CAA's letter, though ambiguously worded, was a valid recommendation for reappointment based on exceptional circumstances, and the President's appointment of Justice Domah for a second term was constitutional. The applicant had sufficient standing as a concerned citizen to bring the petition. The Constitutional Court erred in its narrow interpretation of the recommendation and the requirements for reappointment. The appeal was allowed and the appointment upheld.

  • Judicial appointments
  • Locus standi
  • Judicial review
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Exceptional circumstances in judicial reappointment
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2012] SCCC 2

Moulinie v Government of Seychelles & Anor (CP 11 of 2011)

Moulinie v Government of Seychelles & Anor (CP 11 of 2011) [2012] SCCC 2 (7 May 2012)

The petitioner is entitled to the return of all parcels of land compulsorily acquired by the Government that have not been developed since acquisition or for which there is no government plan to develop. Where land has been developed or transferred to third parties, the petitioner is entitled to monetary compensation at the market value as at the time of coming into force of the Constitution. The Government's failure to prioritize the return of undeveloped land before offering monetary compensation breached the petitioner's constitutional rights under section 14 of Part 3 of Schedule 7 of the…

  • Compulsory acquisition
  • Right to property
  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Return of land
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2012] SCCC 1

Dhanjee v Michel & Ors (CP 15 of 2011)

Dhanjee v Michel & Ors (CP 15 of 2011) [2012] SCCC 1 (17 January 2012)

The Constitutional Court held that the CAA’s recommendation to extend a non-citizen judge’s term was unconstitutional and the President’s appointment void.

  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Judicial independence
  • Appointment and tenure of judges
  • Ultra vires acts
  • Jurisdiction of constitutional court
  • Constitutional-law
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2011] SCCC 8

Prea v Speaker of National Assembly and Anor (9 of 2011)

Prea v Speaker of National Assembly and Anor (9 of 2011) [2011] SCCC 8 (4 September 2011)

The Constitutional Court of Seychelles held that the National Assembly’s 19 July 2011 dissolution complied with Article 111 and was validly resolved.

  • Dissolution of parliament
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Standing orders of parliament
  • Dissolution-of-parliament
  • Constitutional-interpretation
  • Parliamentary-procedure
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2007] SCCC 1

Chow v Gappy & Ors (3 of 2007)

Chow v Gappy & Ors (3 of 2007) [2007] SCCC 1 (3 April 2007)

The court dismissed a constitutional petition challenging the announced general election dates, holding the petitioner lacked Article 130(1) standing and that the election was a general election, not a by-election.

  • Locus standi
  • General elections
  • By-elections
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Constitutional-law
  • Election-law
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2000] SCCA 10

Citra Hoareau v The Government of Seychelles (SCA 42 of 1999)

Citra Hoareau v The Government of Seychelles (SCA 42 of 1999) [2000] SCCA 10 (12 April 2000)

The Court of Appeal held that a constitutional petitioner could seek certiorari and mandamus under Article 130(4)(c) without first seeking a declaration under Article 130(4)(a) or (b).

  • Compulsory acquisition of land
  • Constitutional remedies
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Constitutional-remedies
  • Judicial-review
  • Constitutional-interpretation
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [1997] SCCA 5

Ag v Marzocchi & Ors (SCA 8 of 1996)

Ag v Marzocchi & Ors (SCA 8 of 1996) [1997] SCCA 5 (28 November 1997)

The Court of Appeal held that res judicata barred a fresh constitutional claim for compensation after a prior Supreme Court award for the same land acquisition.

  • Res judicata
  • Compensation for compulsory acquisition
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Res-judicata
  • Compulsory-acquisition-compensation
  • Constitutional-interpretation
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [1997] SCCA 8

Bonte v Government of Seychelles (SCA 20 of 1996)

Bonte v Government of Seychelles (SCA 20 of 1996) [1997] SCCA 8 (25 April 1997)

The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge to the Government’s refusal to return compulsorily acquired land, holding that the Constitution did not require retransfer of developed property.

  • Compulsory acquisition
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • Land restitution
  • Constitutional-interpretation
  • Compulsory-acquisition
  • Land-restitution
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [1997] SCCA 13

Wilkins v Government of Seychelles (SCA 403 of 1992)

Wilkins v Government of Seychelles (SCA 403 of 1992) [1997] SCCA 13 (25 April 1997)

The appellant did not have locus standi to seek relief under paragraph 14 of Schedule 7 to the Constitution because she had not paid the purchase price or registered the sale and was not the person from whom the land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. Only a person whose ownership or right to compensation had been settled under the Act could seek such relief.

  • Locus standi
  • Compulsory acquisition
  • Compensation for land
  • Interpretation of constitutional provisions
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Seychelles decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.