Sign in
Seychelles Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Seychelles Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Seychelles decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional law [2014] SCCA 29

Sullivan v Attorney General & Anor (SCA 25 of 2012)

Sullivan v Attorney General & Anor (SCA 25 of 2012) [2014] SCCA 29 (14 August 2014)

The offence of criminal defamation under sections 184-191 of the Penal Code is not per se unconstitutional as it is sufficiently precise, necessary in a democratic society, and proportionate to the legitimate aim of protecting reputation. The law passes all three constitutionality tests. The court cannot strike down the law in the abstract; only specific applications may be unconstitutional. The appellant's other grounds are premature as no conviction has occurred.

  • Freedom of expression
  • Criminal defamation
  • Proportionality
  • Prescribed by law
  • Necessity in a democratic society
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2012] SCCC 5

Sullivan v Attorney-general & Anor (CP 13 of 2011)

Sullivan v Attorney-general & Anor (CP 13 of 2011) [2012] SCCC 5 (31 July 2012)

Sections 184 to 191 of the Penal Code are formulated with sufficient precision, provide adequate defences, and constitute a prescribed law necessary in a democratic society for the protection of reputation. The arrest and criminal proceedings were lawful and within constitutional limits. There is no unconstitutionality in the impugned provisions or proceedings.

  • Freedom of expression
  • Criminal defamation
  • Constitutionality of penal provisions
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Seychelles decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.