Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal procedure and sentencing [2025] SGHC 56

SEE KIAN KOK v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed an application to admit fresh evidence and upheld a conviction and three-month sentence for conspiracy to cheat in a fraudulent tenancy case.

  • Adducing fresh evidence on appeal
  • Conspiracy to cheat (s 420 read with s 109 pc)
  • Fraudulent tenancy/brothel scams
  • Sentencing and general deterrence
  • Admission of conditioned statements
  • Fresh-evidence-on-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] SGHC 221

ANG BOON HAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court upheld an eight-week sentence for voluntarily causing hurt resulting in grievous hurt, and set out a three-step sentencing framework for section 323A.

  • Voluntarily causing hurt causing grievous hurt (s 323a)
  • Sentencing framework for s 323a
  • Mens rea and asymmetry between fault and physical element
  • Guilty plea discounts
  • Vulnerable victim aggravation
  • Road-rage related violence
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure [2022] SGHC 300

EWE PANG KOOI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court upheld consecutive and consecutive-after-prison rules for stood-down charges, holding that s 322(1) CPC applies to the aggregate later sentence.

  • Commencement of sentence
  • Consecutive sentences (s 307(1) cpc)
  • Sentence commencement discretion (s 322(1) cpc)
  • One‑transaction rule
  • Totality principle
  • Sentencing procedure for stood down charges
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] SGHC 76

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v SHAWN TAN JIA JUN

The High Court allowed the Prosecution’s sentencing appeal, holding that a fine for voluntarily causing hurt was manifestly inadequate and substituting two weeks’ imprisonment.

  • Voluntarily causing hurt (s 323 penal code)
  • Custodial threshold
  • General deterrence
  • Forgiveness as mitigating factor
  • Vulnerability of pregnant victims
  • Voluntarily-causing-hurt
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure and sentencing [2021] SGCA 65

TEO SENG TIONG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court of Appeal held that compounded road traffic offences may be considered as aggravating factors in sentencing for both RTA and non-RTA offences.

  • Compounding of offences
  • Sentencing aggravating factors
  • Autrefois acquit / double jeopardy
  • Driving disqualification
  • Compounding-of-offences
  • Sentencing-aggravating-factors
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure and sentencing [2020] SGHC 06

PRAKASH S/O MANIKAM v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court reduced a s 323 hurt sentence from six months to two months, holding that uncertain injury causation could not all be attributed to the appellant.

  • Voluntarily causing hurt (s 323 penal code)
  • Rioting (s 147 penal code)
  • Obstruction of public servant (s 186 penal code)
  • Sentencing framework and principles
  • Attribution of injuries and benefit of doubt
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure and sentencing [2019] SGCA 64

BPH v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court of Appeal held that the Pram Nair sentencing framework applies to all forms of sexual assault by penetration under s 376 and dismissed both sentence appeals.

  • Sentencing
  • Sexual assault by penetration
  • Sentencing frameworks
  • Abuse of trust
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Totality principle
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] SGHC 306

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v YEO EK BOON, JEFFREY

The High Court held that a one-week sentence for voluntarily causing hurt to a police officer was manifestly inadequate and substituted ten weeks’ imprisonment.

  • Voluntarily causing hurt to a public servant (s332)
  • Benchmark sentencing
  • General deterrence
  • Mens rea and intoxication
  • Caning
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2010] SGHC 123

Balbir Singh s/o Amar Singh v Public Prosecutor and another appeal

The High Court upheld a four-week jail term for a bus captain assault, but reduced a taxi-driver assault sentence from six weeks to a $2,000 fine.

  • Assault (s 323)
  • Sentencing benchmarks
  • Vulnerability of public transport workers
  • De minimis principle (s 95)
  • Private defence/apprehension (s 96)
  • Intoxication as aggravating factor
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2010] SGHC 72

Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Rismail bin Zali

The High Court dismissed the prosecution’s sentence appeal, holding that syndicate involvement was not proved and the seven-month jail term was not manifestly inadequate.

  • Abetting
  • Unlicensed moneylending
  • Syndicated moneylending
  • Sentence adequacy
  • Reformative training
  • Youth and antecedents
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.