Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2018] SGHC 72

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v BDA

The High Court convicted BDA of outraging modesty, rape, and aggravated outrage of modesty against his biological mother, admitting his statements and imposing 16 years and 18 strokes.

  • Rape
  • Outraging modesty
  • Aggravated outrage of modesty
  • Admissibility of statements
  • Voluntariness of confessions
  • Victim credibility
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2015] SGHC 186

Winston Lee Siew Boon v Public Prosecutor

The High Court held the trial judge was not plainly wrong to find the complainant's evidence unusually convincing; the appellant's own voluntary statement (P21) constituted independent corroboration of the physical act; there were no reasonable grounds to conclude the prosecution breached its Kadar disclosure obligation; and the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive, therefore the appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.

  • Outraging modesty
  • Sexual assault
  • Corroboration
  • Prosecutorial disclosure (kadar)
  • Appellate review of credibility
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2014] SGHC 18

ABE v Public Prosecutor

High Court appeal over rape and molestation convictions was dismissed. Fresh medical evidence of erectile difficulties did not create reasonable doubt.

  • Rape
  • Outraging modesty
  • Fresh evidence on appeal
  • Expert medical evidence
  • Burden of proof
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2013] SGHC 174

Public Prosecutor v Sivakumar s/o Selvarajah

The High Court acquitted the accused of impersonating a police officer, but convicted him of outraging modesty, sexual assault and rape, imposing 12 years and 12 cane strokes.

  • Impersonation of public servant
  • Outraging modesty
  • Forcible sexual assault (fellatio)
  • Rape
  • Credibility assessment
  • Sentencing structure (concurrent and consecutive)
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2010] SGHC 233

AKD v Public Prosecutor

The High Court allowed the appeal, quashed four convictions for outraging modesty, and acquitted the appellant because the complainant’s evidence was unsafe.

  • Outraging modesty
  • Section 354 penal code
  • Section 73(2) penal code - employer of domestic maid
  • Credibility assessment of single witness
  • Corroboration
  • Standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2006] SGHC 191

Public Prosecutor v Mohammed Liton Mohammed Syeed Mallik

High Court criminal trial over rape, sodomy, intimidation, modesty and theft charges arising from a disputed lovers’ quarrel.

  • Rape
  • Sodomy
  • Intimidation
  • Outraging modesty
  • Theft
  • Admissibility of statements
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2006] SGHC 138

Chng Yew Chin v Public Prosecutor

High Court upheld molestation convictions but reduced one sentence to a fine after finding the appellant’s recurrent cancer justified judicial mercy.

  • Outraging modesty
  • Judicial mercy due to ill health
  • Credibility of complainant
  • Caning
  • Judicial-mercy
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2003] SGHC 281

Public Prosecutor v ABC

The High Court sentenced a repeat offender to imprisonment and caning for two aggravated rapes, housebreaking and theft, and aggravated outrage of modesty.

  • Rape
  • Outraging modesty
  • Theft
  • Housebreaking by night
  • Caning
  • Consecutive sentences
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2003] SGCA 14

Public Prosecutor v ABC

The Court of Appeal overturned an acquittal on a 1996 outraging modesty charge, holding the child complainant’s evidence was distinct, credible, and not undermined by lack of corroboration.

  • Outraging modesty
  • Rape
  • Corroboration of child evidence
  • Appellate review of findings of fact
  • Treatment of child complainants
  • Outraging-modesty
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2003] SGHC 63

Public Prosecutor v G

The High Court held that outstanding charges not before it could not be taken into account when sentencing, and imposed imprisonment and caning for rape and outrage of modesty.

  • Rape
  • Outraging modesty
  • Consideration of outstanding charges in sentencing
  • Caning
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Outraging-modesty
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.