Standard Bank of South Africa Limited v Luvhomba Financial Services CC (33219/2015) [2025] ZAGPPHC 394 (11 April 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
33219/2015
Judge
Collis
Summary judgment was granted to Standard Bank against a close corporation on a home loan debt, with the property declared executable and costs awarded.
Tuning Fork (Pty) Limited v Kilburn Auto Enterprises (Pty) Limited and Another (19349/2013) [2013] ZAGPJHC 327 (13 December 2013)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
19349/2013
Judge
B H Mbha
The High Court held that a suretyship signed for Tuning Fork (Pty) Ltd covered all the company’s obligations, not only debts linked to one trading division.
Comitis NO and Others v Fairbridge Mall (Pty) Ltd (A332/2012) [2013] ZAWCHC 99 (5 February 2013)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A332/2012
Judges
A.G Binns-Ward, P.B. Fourie, C.M.J Fortuin
The High Court held that the appellants failed to prove a quasi-partnership or deadlock basis for winding up, and dismissed the appeal and fresh-evidence application.
Bright Bay Property Service (Pty) Ltd v Moravian Church in South Africa (3130/12) [2012] ZAWCHC 178; 2013 (3) SA 78 (WCC) (31 October 2012)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
3130/12
Judge
Henney
The court held that under the Companies Act 71 of 2008, reinstatement of a deregistered company does not retrospectively validate acts performed during the period of deregistration. The applicant, having been deregistered, lacked corporate personality and could not lawfully demand specific performance or institute proceedings. Any mining permit issued to the applicant during deregistration was void, as the applicant was a non-existent entity. The agreement between the parties was no longer in operation, and the applicant had no clear right to the relief sought. The respondent was not obliged…
Denver Auto Body Repairers CC v Stand 637 Isando CC and Others (35238/12) [2012] ZAGPJHC 266 (18 October 2012)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
35238/12
Judge
Willis
The High Court dismissed an application to enforce a right of first refusal over immovable property, finding no valid acceptance and no valid exercise through another company.
Esterhuysen v JE Enviro Services CC Abattoir (A275/2010) [2011] ZAFSHC 54 (10 March 2011)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A275/2010
Judges
Hancke, R, Fischer, WND R
The High Court held that the respondent failed to prove a personal contract with the appellant, so the appeal succeeded and the claim was dismissed with costs.
Boerboonfontein BK v La Grange NO and Another (A409/09) [2010] ZAWCHC 81; 2011 (1) SA 58 (WCC) (15 April 2010)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A409/09
Judges
Binns-Ward, Louw, Saldanha
The court held that the institution of eviction proceedings by the close corporation was not properly authorised. The surviving member, Van Tonder, could not unilaterally represent the corporation in litigation without the participation of the executor representing the deceased member's estate. Section 29(3)(e) of the Close Corporations Act entitles such a representative to act as if they were a member, including attending meetings and exercising voting rights. Decisions of the corporation must be made by a majority of votes at a properly convened meeting, and the executor was not afforded th…
Matrotech Engineering CC v Westingcorp Power Industries (Pty) Ltd (20149/2005) [2007] ZAGPHC 95 (6 June 2007)
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Case number
20149/2005
Judge
Botha
The High Court found that Matrotech had a binding contract with Westingcorp, not merely its Zambian office, and awarded the unpaid contract balance with interest and costs.