S v Solomon (266/85) [1986] ZASCA 55; [1986] 2 All SA 443 (A) (26 May 1986)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
266/85
Judges
RABIE, TRENGOVE, BOTHA, JACOBS, SMALBERGER
The court held that the statutory definition of 'dealing' in the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act must be interpreted in its context and restrictively, given its penal nature. The omission of 'purchase' or 'acquire' from the definition, and the clear legislative distinction between 'dealing' and 'possession', indicate that the legislature did not intend to criminalise the act of purchasing a prohibited substance for personal use as 'dealing'. This applies equally to intermediaries or agents acting solely on behalf of a buyer for personal use. The appellant's conduct, purchasing a Mandrax tablet…