Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 73

Royale Energy Proprietary Limited v FuelEx Proprietary Limited (LM093Aug22)

Royale Energy Proprietary Limited v FuelEx Proprietary Limited (LM093Aug22) [2022] ZACT 73; [2023] 1 CPLR 9 (CT) (14 November 2022)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Royale Energy’s acquisition of FuelEx, imposing a two-year moratorium on retrenchments and finding no substantial competition harm.

  • Large Merger
  • Public Interest
  • Hdp Ownership
  • Employment Effects
  • Business Rescue
  • Market Share Assessment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 36

NMI Durban South Motors (Pty) Ltd v The Barloworld Motor Retail Business (LM202Feb21)

NMI Durban South Motors (Pty) Ltd v The Barloworld Motor Retail Business (LM202Feb21) [2021] ZACT 36 (21 May 2021)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved NMI Durban South Motors’ acquisition of Barloworld’s motor retail business, subject to supplier development and reporting conditions.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Supplier Development Programme
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Employment Protection
  • Large-merger-review
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 12

Flameup Investments (Pty) Ltd v Festigen Investments (LM163Mar20)

Flameup Investments (Pty) Ltd v Festigen Investments (LM163Mar20) [2020] ZACT 12 (8 April 2020)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Flameup Investments’ acquisition of River Crescent Centre from Festigen Investments, finding no likely competition or public-interest harm.

  • Merger Control
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Public Interest
  • Employment Effects
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 5

Brimstone Investment Corporation Ltd v Firefly Investments 306 (Pty) Ltd (LM137Nov19)

Brimstone Investment Corporation Ltd v Firefly Investments 306 (Pty) Ltd (LM137Nov19) [2020] ZACT 5 (15 January 2020)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Brimstone’s acquisition of sole control of Firefly, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Public Interest
  • Employment Effects
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2018] ZACT 10

Royal Bofokeng Platinum Ltd v Maseve Investments 11 (Pty) Ltd (LM220Nov17)

Royal Bofokeng Platinum Ltd v Maseve Investments 11 (Pty) Ltd (LM220Nov17) [2018] ZACT 10 (13 February 2018)

The Tribunal conditionally approved RBPlat’s acquisition of Maseve, finding no substantial competition concerns and imposing employment protections and reporting conditions.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Retrenchment Analysis
  • Section 197 Lra
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 97

Old Mutual Capital Holding (Pty) Ltd v Old Mutual Finance (Pty) Ltd (RF) (019232)

Old Mutual Capital Holding (Pty) Ltd v Old Mutual Finance (Pty) Ltd (RF) (019232) [2014] ZACT 97 (30 September 2014)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Old Mutual Capital Holding’s acquisition of greater control in Old Mutual Finance after finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Public Interest
  • Unsecured Loans
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 101

Humulani Investments (Pty) Ltd v MacNeil (Pty) Ltd (88/LM/Oct12)

Humulani Investments (Pty) Ltd v MacNeil (Pty) Ltd (88/LM/Oct12) [2012] ZACT 101 (3 December 2012)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Humulani Investments’ merger with MacNeil, finding no substantial competition concerns and no adverse public interest effects.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Public Interest
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 89

Unitrans Automotive (Pty) Ltd v Reeds Motor Group (Pty) Ltd (86/LM/Sep12)

Unitrans Automotive (Pty) Ltd v Reeds Motor Group (Pty) Ltd (86/LM/Sep12) [2012] ZACT 89 (29 October 2012)

The Competition Tribunal approved Unitrans Automotive’s merger with Reeds Motor Group and Reeds Motors Tableview unconditionally, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Horizontal Merger
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Public Interest
  • Motor Vehicle Dealerships
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 61

Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (SOC) Ltd v Certain Offshore Oil and Gas Assets in South Africa Held by Pioneer Natural Resources South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (55/LM/May12)

Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (SOC) Ltd v Certain Offshore Oil and Gas Assets in South Africa Held by Pioneer Natural Resources South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (55/LM/May12) [2012] ZACT 61; [2012] 2 CPLR 516 (CT) (20 July 2012)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved PetroSA’s acquisition of offshore oil and gas assets from Pioneer SA and PSC, finding no substantial competition concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2011] ZACT 75

TP Hentiq 6159 (Pty) Ltd v Xeedan Property Portfolio (45/LM/Jun11)

TP Hentiq 6159 (Pty) Ltd v Xeedan Property Portfolio (45/LM/Jun11) [2011] ZACT 75 (3 October 2011)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved TP Hentiq’s acquisition of Xeedan Property Portfolio, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concerns.

  • Property Merger
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Public Interest
  • Competition Approval
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.