Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Delict [2022] ZALMPPHC 42

Rossouw v Mogorotsi and Another (HCA30/2019)

Rossouw v Mogorotsi and Another (HCA30/2019) [2022] ZALMPPHC 42 (10 August 2022)

The High Court dismissed an appeal in a malicious prosecution case, holding that the respondents had a reasonable basis to complain after an altercation and alleged racial insult.

  • Malicious Prosecution
  • Crimen Injuria
  • Racial Insult
  • Reasonable And Probable Cause
  • Dignity
  • Assault
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2020] ZAECGHC 14

Horwitz v S (CA&R129/2019)

Horwitz v S (CA&R129/2019) [2020] ZAECGHC 14; 2020 (1) SACR 587 (ECG) (25 February 2020)

High Court appeal in a criminal matter. Conviction for assault was set aside, but the crimen injuria conviction and sentence were upheld.

  • Crimen Injuria
  • Single Witness Cautionary Rule
  • Racial Insult
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Appeal Procedure
  • Crimen-injuria
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2014] ZANCHC 30

Van Vuuren v S (CA&R 64/14)

Van Vuuren v S (CA&R 64/14) [2014] ZANCHC 30 (17 September 2014)

Appeal against a crimen injuria conviction dismissed. The court held that the State’s evidence had no material contradictions and the appellant’s version was improbable.

  • Crimen Injuria
  • Racial Insult
  • Credibility Of Witnesses
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Appeal Against Conviction
  • Crimen-injuria
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2014] ZASCA 47

Pistorius v S (253/2013)

Pistorius v S (253/2013) [2014] ZASCA 47; 2014 (2) SACR 314 (SCA) (1 April 2014)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial magistrate correctly approached the evidence of the complainant as a single witness, taking into account the cautionary rule and the credibility of the witness. The contradictions between the complainant and the medical evidence were not material enough to undermine the complainant's reliability, especially given the lapse of time and the absence of documentary evidence. The appellant's version was found to be improbable and not reasonably possibly true, particularly in light of the inherent probabilities and the conduct of the complainant foll…

  • Assault With Intent To Do Grievous Bodily Harm
  • Crimen Injuria
  • Single Witness Evidence
  • Credibility Findings
  • Racial Insult
  • Hate Speech
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2012] ZAWCHC 106

Steyn v S (A480/2011)

Steyn v S (A480/2011) [2012] ZAWCHC 106 (10 February 2012)

High Court appeal against convictions for crimen injuria, assault and malicious damage to property dismissed. The court also rejected the claim of self-defence.

  • Crimen Injuria
  • Assault
  • Malicious Damage To Property
  • Defence Of Necessity
  • Racial Insult
  • Crimen-injuria
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2004] ZANCHC 88

S v Gnade (CA & R 125/04)

S v Gnade (CA & R 125/04) [2004] ZANCHC 88 (1 November 2004)

High Court appeal in a criminal matter dismissed. The convictions for assault and crimen iniuria, and the sentences, were confirmed.

  • Crimen Iniuria
  • Assault
  • Dolus Eventualis
  • Racial Insult
  • Appeal Procedure
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2004] ZAECHC 14

S v Henning (ECJ 2004/008)

S v Henning (ECJ 2004/008) [2004] ZAECHC 14 (28 May 2004)

The High Court upheld a crimen iniuria conviction for a racial insult but set aside direct imprisonment, replacing it with a fine and suspended imprisonment.

  • Crimen Iniuria
  • Racial Insult
  • Sentencing
  • Provocation
  • Dignitas
  • Crimen-iniuria
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.