Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
7 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] ZANCHC 40

S v Ncube and Another (Review) (CA&R25/2024)

S v Ncube and Another (Review) (CA&R25/2024) [2025] ZANCHC 40 (5 May 2025)

The High Court held that a special review before sentence was not justified because the magistrate’s doubts arose from post-conviction events, not a procedural irregularity.

  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 304a
  • Rape Conviction
  • Review Before Sentence
  • Credibility Of Witness
  • Irregularity In Proceedings
  • Criminal-procedure-act-section-304a
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZASCA 172

Sethosa v S (679/2023)

Sethosa v S (679/2023) [2024] ZASCA 172 (12 December 2024)

The SCA set aside a High Court dismissal of a petition for leave to appeal because the trial record was incomplete and needed reconstruction.

  • Rape Conviction
  • Incomplete Record
  • Petition For Leave To Appeal
  • Record Reconstruction
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Incomplete-record
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZANWHC 182

Modibedi v Raborife N.O and Another (M614/2022)

Modibedi v Raborife N.O and Another (M614/2022) [2023] ZANWHC 182 (3 October 2023)

None of the grounds for review advanced by the applicant were sustained. The court found no evidence that the Magistrate read or relied on the bail affidavit, and her conduct in handing it to the prosecutor was appropriate. The death of the witness was not disputed, and the absence of a death certificate did not constitute a procedural irregularity. The complainant's evidence was uncontested, as the defence chose not to cross-examine, and the Magistrate was correct to accept it. The State was not obliged to call all listed witnesses, and the defence could have called any of them. The absence…

  • Review Of Magistrates Court Proceedings
  • Bias And Recusal
  • Admission Of Evidence
  • Single Witness Cautionary Rule
  • Rape Conviction
  • Procedural Irregularity
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZAGPJHC 333

Sethosa v S (A10/2023)

Sethosa v S (A10/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 333 (3 March 2023)

The High Court dismissed a bail appeal pending petition for leave to appeal after the petition was refused and the appellant’s attorneys withdrew the appeal.

  • Bail Pending Appeal
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Rape Conviction
  • Bail-pending-appeal
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Rape-conviction
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2021] ZAECGHC 119

Tyhala v S (CC22/2019)

Tyhala v S (CC22/2019) [2021] ZAECGHC 119 (23 November 2021)

The High Court struck an out-of-time leave-to-appeal application from the roll because the grounds were vague and the condonation affidavit failed to address prospects of success.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Condonation
  • Rape Conviction
  • Life Imprisonment
  • Grounds Of Appeal
  • Criminal Procedure Act
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2020] ZASCA 47

Pretorius v S (705/2019)

Pretorius v S (705/2019) [2020] ZASCA 47 (4 May 2020)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that leave to appeal should have been granted in a rape conviction matter because reasonable prospects of success existed.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Rape Conviction
  • Reasonable Prospect Of Success
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Rape-conviction
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAGPJHC 611

Morake v Van Schalkwyk and Another (A765/2014)

Morake v Van Schalkwyk and Another (A765/2014) [2018] ZAGPJHC 611 (29 October 2018)

The court found that the applicant failed to establish any reasonable or objective grounds for apprehension of bias on the part of the magistrate. The applicant was given an opportunity to object to the constitution of the court at the outset and did not do so. The photograph of the magistrate reading a docket was not shown to be related to the applicant's case, and the evidence indicated it concerned unrelated matters. The court held that the apprehension of bias was illusory and not supported by facts. Consequently, the application for review and all ancillary orders were dismissed. The cou…

  • Recusal Of Judicial Officer
  • Apprehension Of Bias
  • Rape Conviction
  • Minimum Sentence
  • Review Proceedings
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2014] ZAGPPHC 711

Mandlazi v S (A668/13)

Mandlazi v S (A668/13) [2014] ZAGPPHC 711 (12 September 2014)

The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal a rape conviction and 10-year sentence, finding no reasonable prospects of success.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Rape Conviction
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Assessment Of Evidence
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2012] ZAECGHC 78

S v McLaggan (CC70/2011)

S v McLaggan (CC70/2011) [2012] ZAECGHC 78; 2013 (1) SACR 267 (ECG) (4 October 2012)

The court found that, given the complexities of the evidence, including reliance on a single witness and the complainant's compromised state, there exists a reasonable possibility that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the applicant's guilt. Similarly, the respondent's application for leave to appeal against sentence was granted because there is a reasonable prospect that another court may find the mitigating factors insufficient to constitute substantial and compelling circumstances justifying a lesser sentence. The court emphasized that the defects in the applicant's…

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Rape Conviction
  • Sentence Appeal
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Single Witness Evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2011] ZAFSHC 201

Barnard v S (P87/11)

Barnard v S (P87/11) [2011] ZAFSHC 201 (8 December 2011)

The Free State High Court granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal after finding reasonable prospects that another court might differ on conviction and sentence.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Rape Conviction
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Evaluation Of Evidence
  • Misdirection
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.