Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Jose v Road Accident Fund (76402/2019) [2025] ZAGPPHC 682 (1 July 2025)
A pedestrian injured when a reversing vehicle struck him proved liability against the Road Accident Fund, but failed to prove loss of earnings.
Nwayo v Road Accident Fund (13607/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 667 (30 June 2025)
The High Court refused default judgment against the Road Accident Fund because the plaintiff’s statutory affidavit was commissioned before the accident and could not be relied on.
Gauche v Road Accident Fund (38422/15) [2025] ZAGPPHC 595 (30 May 2025)
The court found the RAF liable for proven damages from an unidentified taxi-driven collision, but dismissed the plaintiff’s loss of earnings claim as unproven.
Vilakazi v Road Accident Fund (448/2022) [2025] ZAGPJHC 245 (19 February 2025)
Default judgment in a Road Accident Fund claim. The court awarded future loss of income, ordered an unlimited medical undertaking, and postponed general damages.
Maluleka v Road Accident Fund (27736/2022) [2025] ZAGPJHC 187 (4 February 2025)
The High Court granted a Rule 38(2) application, held the Road Accident Fund 90% liable, and awarded R1,159,884 for loss of income, with general damages postponed.
Boshomane v Road Accident Fund (Reasons) (77531/2014) [2024] ZAGPPHC 915 (4 September 2024)
High Court reasons in a Road Accident Fund matter: the plaintiff succeeded on 70% merits, Rule 38(2) evidence by affidavit was allowed, and damages were assessed.
Zoolakha v G L Events Oasys Consortium and Another (19126/18) [2021] ZAGPPHC 433 (18 June 2021)
The High Court allowed an elderly, ill plaintiff to record evidence on commission under Rule 38, while preserving the respondents’ procedural rights.
Ishmail v G L Events Oasys Consortium and Another (19126/18) [2021] ZAGPPHC 384 (18 June 2021)
The court granted an elderly plaintiff leave to record evidence on commission under Rule 38 because of ill-health, while preserving the respondents’ participation rights.
Explore more
