Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2021] ZAFSHC 358

S v Mbonjeni (R85/2021)

S v Mbonjeni (R85/2021) [2021] ZAFSHC 358 (12 November 2021)

The High Court set aside a culpable homicide conviction because the section 112(2) guilty-plea statement lacked sufficient facts to show negligence.

  • Culpable Homicide
  • Section 112 2 Statement
  • Plea Procedure
  • Negligence
  • Section 113 Correction Of Plea
  • Culpable-homicide
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZALMPTHC 13

S v Rendani (82/2017)

S v Rendani (82/2017) [2017] ZALMPTHC 13 (1 November 2017)

High Court review confirming a magistrate’s conviction and sentence after a guilty plea to assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.

  • Guilty Plea Procedure
  • Assault With Intent To Do Grievous Bodily Harm
  • Section 112 2 Statement
  • Magistrates Court Review
  • Guilty-plea-procedure
  • Section-112-2-statement
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZAGPPHC 867

S v Molefe (281/17)

S v Molefe (281/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 867 (16 October 2017)

The court found that the section 112(2) statement was insufficient as it merely repeated the charge sheet and failed to provide the factual matrix required for a valid guilty plea. The absence of the Prosecutor's acceptance of the plea was noted but deemed immaterial since the plea itself was defective. Consequently, the conviction and sentence could not stand and the matter had to be remitted to the trial court to comply with section 113(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

  • Culpable Homicide
  • Plea Procedure
  • Section 112 2 Statement
  • Section 113 1 Correction
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2012] ZAFSHC 119

Moshata and Another v S (A2/2011)

Moshata and Another v S (A2/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 119 (21 June 2012)

High Court review of a robbery conviction and sentence was dismissed after the court held that a section 112(2) statement did not require oral confirmation in the circumstances.

  • Section 112 2 Statement
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Procedural Irregularity
  • Review Of Conviction
  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Section-112-2-statement
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.