S v Molefe (281/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 867 (16 October 2017)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
281/17
Judges
D S Fourie, H J Fabricius
The court found that the section 112(2) statement was insufficient as it merely repeated the charge sheet and failed to provide the factual matrix required for a valid guilty plea. The absence of the Prosecutor's acceptance of the plea was noted but deemed immaterial since the plea itself was defective. Consequently, the conviction and sentence could not stand and the matter had to be remitted to the trial court to comply with section 113(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Moshata and Another v S (A2/2011) [2012] ZAFSHC 119 (21 June 2012)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A2/2011
Judges
Daffue, R, Snellenburg, WND R
High Court review of a robbery conviction and sentence was dismissed after the court held that a section 112(2) statement did not require oral confirmation in the circumstances.