The court held that the appellant, as the accused, bore the onus to prove on a balance of probabilities that his conduct fell within the protection of section 49(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The appellant failed to establish that there were no reasonable alternatives to using deadly force to effect the arrest or prevent escape. The evidence showed that the appellant could have used other means, such as blocking the vehicle or calling for assistance, and that the deceased did not exhibit conduct amounting to flight or resistance justifying lethal force. The court found that the appellant'…