South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 5 court collections
Last checked: 10 Oct 2026, 11:23 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

26 Feb 2025

Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 290

Siyandasabelo Trading (Pty) Ltd v Rivermeadow Manor (Pty) Ltd and Others (Ex Tempore) (021361/2025)

Siyandasabelo Trading (Pty) Ltd v Rivermeadow Manor (Pty) Ltd and Others (Ex Tempore) (021361/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 290 (26 February 2025)

Court: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number: 021361/2025
Judge: Yende

The High Court struck an urgent application off the roll for lack of urgency, finding the delay self-created and ordering party-and-party costs.

Urgency In Motion Proceedings
Uniform Rule 6 12
Condonation For Non Compliance
Self Created Urgency
Urgent-application
Uniform-rule-6-12

Read case analysis

26 Feb 2025

Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 260

DLC 56 Group (Pty) Ltd and Another v Mohlawe Technology (Pty) Ltd and Others (Ex tempore) (005443/2025)

DLC 56 Group (Pty) Ltd and Another v Mohlawe Technology (Pty) Ltd and Others (Ex tempore) (005443/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 260 (26 February 2025)

Court: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number: 005443/2025
Judge: Yende

The High Court struck an urgent application from the roll, holding that the applicants failed to show genuine urgency or prove contempt from the evidence filed.

Urgent Application
Uniform Rule 6 12
Contempt Of Court
Costs Order
Urgent-application
Uniform-rule-6-12

Read case analysis

24 Feb 2025

Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 261

Edging Zone (Pty) Ltd (Ex Tempore) (024398/2024), Ex parte

Edging Zone (Pty) Ltd (Ex Tempore) (024398/2024), Ex parte [2025] ZAGPPHC 261 (24 February 2025)

Court: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number: 024398/2024
Judge: Yende

The High Court struck an ex parte urgent application from the roll, finding the applicant failed to show genuine urgency under Uniform Rule 6(12).

Uniform Rule 6 12
Urgency Threshold
Substantial Redress
Self Created Urgency
Uniform-rule-6-12
Urgent-application

Read case analysis

7 Feb 2025

Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 149

Maluleka and Another v Minister of Communication and Digital Technologies and Others (2025-008898)

Maluleka and Another v Minister of Communication and Digital Technologies and Others (2025-008898) [2025] ZAGPPHC 149 (7 February 2025)

Court: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number: 2025-008898
Judge: Yende

The High Court struck an urgent application from the roll, finding that the applicants failed to show genuine urgency under Rule 6(12) and had created the urgency themselves.

Urgent Application
Uniform Rule 6 12
Self Created Urgency
Costs Award
Urgent-application
Uniform-rule-6-12

Read case analysis

5 Feb 2025

Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 131

Royal AM Football Club (Pty) Ltd v Venter N.O and Others (2025-011702)

Royal AM Football Club (Pty) Ltd v Venter N.O and Others (2025-011702) [2025] ZAGPPHC 131 (5 February 2025)

Court: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number: 2025-011702
Judge: Yende

The court found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold for urgency as prescribed by Rule 6(12). The urgency relied upon was self-created and subjective, and the applicant did not provide sufficient reasons why substantial redress could not be obtained at a hearing in due course. The court emphasized the importance of preserving the sanctity of the urgent court for genuinely urgent matters and maintaining legal certainty. Consequently, the application was struck from the roll for lack of urgency, and costs were awarded against the applicant in favour of the first and second respondent…

Source excerpt

Urgent Application
Uniform Rule 6 12
Self Created Urgency
Costs Order

Read case analysis

18 Oct 2024

Civil Procedure [2024] ZALMPPHC 147

Mathara Investments CC v State Information Technology Agency Soc Limited and Another (10224/2024)

Mathara Investments CC v State Information Technology Agency Soc Limited and Another (10224/2024) [2024] ZALMPPHC 147 (18 October 2024)

Court: Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number: 10224/2024
Judge: N Gaisa

The High Court struck the urgent application from the roll, finding the applicant had not shown sufficient urgency or irreparable harm after a 13-day delay.

Urgent Application
Uniform Rule 6 12
Striking From Roll
Service Level Agreement Termination
Urgent-application
Uniform-rule-6-12

Read case analysis

20 Aug 2024

Civil Procedure [2024] ZAFSHC 250

Welkom United Taxi Association and Others v Majakathata Long Distance Taxi Association and Others (5348/2021)

Welkom United Taxi Association and Others v Majakathata Long Distance Taxi Association and Others (5348/2021) [2024] ZAFSHC 250 (20 August 2024)

Court: Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number: 5348/2021
Judge: Mhlambi

The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal against prohibitory and mandatory interdicts and a costs order, finding no reasonable prospect of success.

Interdicts
Leave To Appeal
Costs Orders
Superior Courts Act
Uniform Rule 6 12
Leave-to-appeal

Read case analysis

15 Jul 2024

Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 711

Matlala and Another v Head of Prison Leeuwkop Maximum Prison and Others (2024/059539)

Matlala and Another v Head of Prison Leeuwkop Maximum Prison and Others (2024/059539) [2024] ZAGPJHC 711 (15 July 2024)

Court: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number: 2024/059539
Judge: L. Windell

The High Court struck an urgent prison-transfer review application from the roll for lack of urgency, holding that the applicants failed to meet Rule 6(12)(b).