Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Respondent obtained the grant of letters of administration by concealing the existence of a pending administration and by making untrue allegations essential to justify the grant, thus revocation is warranted under section 49(1)(b) and (c) of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act.
Source excerpt
Grant of letters of administration revoked due to Respondents' misrepresentation of identity and violation of section 49(1)(a)(b)(c) of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act; Applicant not appointed as administrator or co-administrator as it would perpetuate the issues complained of.
Source excerpt
The appeal lacks merit as the grounds raised either were not properly substantiated, contained new matters not raised at trial, or misunderstood the legal requirements regarding clan meetings and family minutes. The appointment of the respondent as administrator was lawful and supported by the lower courts' findings.
Source excerpt
The Probate and Administration of Estates Act [Cap 352] contains sufficient safeguards to protect heirs and beneficiaries. The challenged provisions do not violate Article 24(1) of the Constitution. The mere possibility of abuse does not render the statute unconstitutional. The petitioner's claim fails as the law provides adequate remedies and procedural protections.
Source excerpt
Sufficient causes for delay were shown in the applicant's affidavit, including verification requirements, institutional demands, and logistical challenges, warranting extension of time.
Source excerpt
The High Court of Tanzania granted Rachel Juana Ballali letters of administration over the unadministered estate of Daudi Timothy Ballali after no caveat was filed.
The appellant failed to establish competence and impartiality, and the petition did not comply with statutory requirements; the trial court did not err in its determination or procedure.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that the District Court lacked jurisdiction to appoint new administrators of an estate, revoked the appointment, and allowed the appeal.
It was legally improper and discriminatory for the High Court to revoke the appointment of only one co-administrator; both should face equal consequences. Appointing appellant as sole administrator would cause further delay; joining appellant as co-administrator with respondents ensures protection of interests and expedites estate administration.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Arusha granted letters of administration pendente lite to three applicants for the estate of the late Melleo Auye Mrema pending determination of the probate cause.
Explore more
