Tanzania Case Law

ayed c republique tunisienne requete no 0082019 2025 afchpr 10 5 fevrier 2025

Court

TANZLII

The applicant did not exhaust available domestic remedies as required by Article 56(5) of the Charter and Rule 50(2)(e) of the Rules, since he could have pursued further judicial actions under national law. The application is therefore inadmissible.

Source excerpt

• Non-discrimination
• Equality before the law
• Fair trial
• Right to information
• Access to public service
• Right to health

Read case analysis

dembele and others v republic of mali application no 0232017 2024 afchpr 10 4 june 2024

Court

TANZLII

The African Court found no violation in Mali’s refusal to regularise police officers’ promotion and training applications, and dismissed the case.

• Equality before the law
• Non-discrimination
• Access to public service
• Promotion in public employment
• Right to education
• Exhaustion of local remedies

Read case analysis

sangare and others v republic of mali application no 0072019 2022 afchpr 16 23 june 2022

Court

TANZLII

The African Court held that Mali did not discriminate against police officers excluded from training and promotion, and that its rules on prior authorisation were reasonable.

• Equality before the law
• Non-discrimination
• Access to public service
• Right to education
• Promotion in public employment
• Equality-before-the-law

Read case analysis