Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court at Tanga allowed a land appeal, expunged Exhibit R1, set aside the tribunal decision, and declared the appellant the lawful owner.
Documents not annexed to pleadings or properly filed lack foundation and cannot be admitted except for the letter addressed to Land Commissioner dated 19/7/1999, which was annexed in the plaint.
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed because, despite the expunging of the seizure certificate for procedural irregularity, the oral testimonies of prosecution witnesses and other properly admitted exhibits were credible, consistent, and sufficient to prove the appellant's unlawful possession of government trophies beyond reasonable doubt. The identification and valuation of the tusks were adequately conducted by a qualified expert, the absence of a receipt was not fatal due to the signed seizure certificate, the delay in arraignment did not prejudice the appellant or vitiate the proceedings, and the pre…
Source excerpt
The most recent and controlling precedent is Anania Clavery Betela v. Republic, which holds that strict chain of custody is not mandatory for items not easily altered, and that witness knowledge and relevance are sufficient for admissibility. The bank slip is relevant, not easily altered, and the witness has knowledge of it; thus, it is admissible.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt due to a fatal variance between the charge and the evidence, and the inventory form was fatally defective and expunged, leaving insufficient evidence to support the conviction.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed the prosecution’s appeal, upholding acquittals in a rape case because the evidence contained material contradictions and doubt.
The Court of Appeal allowed a criminal appeal involving alleged unlawful possession and dealing in elephant tusks, finding the prosecution had not proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for unnatural offence involving child victims, but corrected the lawfulness of sentence on the second and third counts.
There is no mandatory provision requiring attachment of intended exhibits to witness statements; documents properly listed and served may be tendered for admission subject to rules of admissibility.
Source excerpt
The first appellate court erred in expunging exhibits P1-P15 as the originals were destroyed by the respondent and the copies were properly admitted under Rule 11(1) of GN 66 of 1972. The Evidence Act does not apply to primary courts. However, the appellant's claim was only substantiated to the extent of the amounts admitted by the respondent; the remainder was unproven due to credibility issues and evidence of document alteration.
Source excerpt
Explore more
