Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court lacked jurisdiction to try the appellant because the DPP's consent did not specifically reference the statutory provisions under which the appellant was charged, rendering the proceedings, judgment, and sentence a nullity.
Source excerpt
The trial was a nullity because the District Court lacked jurisdiction to try the economic offence without a DPP certificate and consent, rendering all proceedings, conviction, and sentence void.
Source excerpt
The trial court lacked jurisdiction due to defective consent from the Director of Public Prosecutions, rendering the proceedings, conviction, and sentence illegal and a nullity. Retrial is ordered in the interests of justice.
Source excerpt
The absence of specific and properly endorsed consent from the Director of Public Prosecutions for the charged offence of abuse of position deprived the trial court of jurisdiction, rendering the proceedings, conviction, and sentence a nullity and incurable by law.
Source excerpt
The District Court lacked jurisdiction to try the offences as the required consent and certificate from the Director of Public Prosecutions were not properly issued; proceedings and judgment are a nullity.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed the criminal appeal, quashed the convictions, set aside the sentences, and ordered the appellant’s release unless lawfully held.
The District Court lacked jurisdiction to try the case due to absence of proper consent from the Director of Public Prosecutions; proceedings and conviction are nullified.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a conviction for wildlife and economic offences, and set aside sentences after finding defective consent and evidentiary contradictions.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal over defective DPP consent and unresolved evidence contradictions, quashing the convictions and setting aside sentence.
Conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of government trophy were based on an invalid evaluation and certification by an incompetent officer and absence of the trophy as evidence; this rendered the conviction and sentence on count 4 illegal and untenable. Other counts were proven beyond reasonable doubt and unaffected by procedural irregularities.
Source excerpt
Explore more
