Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court at Tanga allowed a land appeal, expunged Exhibit R1, set aside the tribunal decision, and declared the appellant the lawful owner.
The High Court at Kigoma dismissed a land appeal, upholding the tribunal’s finding that the appellant failed to prove ownership of the disputed plot.
No point of law or misapprehension of evidence was found; both lower courts properly analysed evidence and found contradictions in prosecution case; offence not proved beyond reasonable doubt; no basis for interference by second appellate court.
Source excerpt
The court found that the transaction involved deliberate misrepresentation and deception by the appellant, who solicited and received funds for a vehicle that had already been sold to another party. The prosecution established all elements of obtaining money by false pretence, and the defence failed to raise reasonable doubt. The matter was criminal, not civil, in nature.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a land appeal, upholding findings that the respondent proved ownership and trespass, and rejecting adverse possession and limitation arguments.
The High Court allowed a land appeal after finding the tribunal’s judgment relied on extraneous facts not reflected in the record and ordered a retrial.
The High Court allowed a second criminal appeal, set aside the lower courts’ acquittals, and convicted the respondents for criminal trespass.
The prosecution failed to scientifically establish the nature of the trophies and did not prove the location of the offence within the statutory boundaries of the Serengeti National Park. The GPS map printout was not properly authenticated as electronic evidence, and the inventory form was not justified in lieu of physical exhibits. The trial court's conviction and sentence were not supported by admissible and sufficient evidence.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved all elements of statutory rape, including the age of the victim and penetration, through credible oral and documentary evidence. The trial court properly evaluated the evidence of both sides and the conviction was based on the strength of the prosecution's case, not the weakness of the defence. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved all elements of the offence of grievous harm beyond reasonable doubt through credible and corroborated evidence; identification of the appellant was reliable both visually and by voice; there was no legal requirement to call the appellant's wife as a witness; and the trial court properly considered and rejected the appellant's defence.
Source excerpt
Explore more
