Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Given the credible threat to prosecution witnesses and their families, as evidenced by prior violence and ongoing attempts to identify and intimidate witnesses, and in accordance with statutory provisions, the court is justified in granting non-disclosure and protection orders to ensure witness safety and the integrity of the trial.
Source excerpt
The improper heading of the charge sheet and failure to use prescribed forms did not affect the jurisdiction of the Primary Court or prejudice the appellant, as the substance of the charge remained intact and the right to recall witnesses after amendment was granted and in process. No miscarriage of justice or violation of law was demonstrated.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding a fair-trial violation in the failure to complete cross-examination of a witness, and ordered a retrial.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the appellant was charged and convicted under the wrong Penal Code provision, rendering the charge defective and the trial unfair.
The conviction was quashed because the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to variance between the charge and evidence, unresolved contradictions in prosecution witness testimonies, absence of key witnesses, and failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements prejudicing the appellant's right to a fair trial.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal allowed a criminal appeal involving alleged unlawful possession and dealing in elephant tusks, finding the prosecution had not proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
The conviction and sentence were quashed and set aside due to procedural irregularities, specifically the improper admission of the inventory form (exhibit P6) and denial of the right to cross-examine a co-accused, both of which prejudiced the appellants and amounted to a denial of a fair trial.
Source excerpt
The failure of the trial court to read out the contents of admitted documentary exhibits (seizure certificate and chain of custody) is a fatal procedural irregularity that renders the proceedings, conviction, and sentence a nullity, necessitating a retrial before a competent magistrate.
Source excerpt
The trial court failed to categorically inform the appellant of his rights to call defence witnesses as required by section 231(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, rendering the subsequent proceedings, conviction, and sentence invalid.
Source excerpt
The charge against the appellant was fatally defective for failing to specify the particular act constituting 'trafficking,' thereby denying the appellant a fair trial. The conviction and sentence could not stand and were set aside.
Source excerpt
Explore more
