Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The notice of appeal was premised on an interlocutory order that did not finally and conclusively determine the suit. The order did not amount to a preliminary decree or a final determination of the substantive issues. Therefore, the notice of appeal and the appeal itself are incompetent and must be struck out.
Source excerpt
The order striking out the application in Misc. Civil Application No. 18 of 2023 was final and conclusive as it disposed of the matter and deregistered it from the court register, with nothing pending for determination. Therefore, the preliminary objection lacks merit.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that a CMA order compelling production of documents was interlocutory, not final. The application for revision was therefore dismissed under Rule 50.
The Court of Appeal held that a judgment on admission was interlocutory, not final, because undetermined claims remained in the High Court. The appeal was struck out as incompetent.
An order granting condonation of time is interlocutory and does not finally determine the rights of the parties; therefore, a revision application against such an order is incompetent and barred by Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules.
Source excerpt
An order granting condonation of time is interlocutory, not final, as it does not conclusively determine the substantive rights or reliefs of the parties. Revision against such an order is incompetent and barred by Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules.
Source excerpt
The Court lacks jurisdiction to revise interlocutory orders of the High Court that do not finally determine the suit, as barred by section 5(2)(d) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act. The impugned order dismissing preliminary objections did not dispose of the application or suit, and no exceptional circumstances were established to invoke revisional jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out a criminal appeal as incompetent because the High Court’s retrial order did not finally determine the criminal charge.
The refusal to stay proceedings pending arbitration finally determined the petition by barring the parties from arbitration, thus constituting a final order appealable under Section 5(2)(d) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1979 as amended.
Source excerpt
Explore more
