Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court entered a consent judgment in a land dispute over a residential licence, ordering revocation of the 1st defendant’s licence and issuance of a new one to the plaintiff.
The respondent failed to prove that there was a mutual agreement to terminate the applicant's employment, as the signatures on the purported agreement and payment confirmation were contested and not verified. The arbitrator erred in relying on these documents. Therefore, the termination was unfair both substantively and procedurally.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania held that the respondent’s letter of offer was not authentic and allowed the appeal, declaring the appellant the lawful owner.
The High Court allowed a second land appeal, holding that failure to mediate at the Ward Tribunal and denial of rejoinder vitiated the proceedings.
The High Court nullified CMA proceedings after finding the dispute was filed out of time without valid condonation and that some represented persons had not consented.
The High Court allowed a land appeal, set aside the tribunal decision, and held that the appellant proved ownership while the respondent’s title evidence was unreliable.
The High Court held that the plaintiff’s vendor lacked good title and could not pass valid ownership of the disputed 12-acre land, so the suit was dismissed with costs.
The sale and transfer documents relied upon by the appellant were found to be forged based on credible expert evidence and supporting testimony; thus, there was no lawful disposition of the suit property, and the 1st respondent, having jointly acquired and developed the property, had locus standi to challenge the transaction and seek relief. The award of general damages was justified but reduced to a reasonable amount.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a land appeal, holding the appellant lacked authority to buy land for a registered church and setting aside the tribunal’s decision.
The High Court held that the plaintiff’s land documents were forged, the first defendant was the lawful allocatee, and the suit was dismissed with costs.
Explore more
