AWADHI ALLY NESTO MLAVA Vs
The prosecution proved all elements of the offence of grievous harm beyond reasonable doubt through credible and corroborated evidence; identification of the appellant was reliable both visually and by voice; there was no legal requirement to call the appellant's wife as a witness; and the trial court properly considered and rejected the appellant's defence.
Source excerpt
- Grievous harm
- Standard of proof
- Identification evidence
- Evaluation of evidence
- Right to call witnesses