Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The application was struck out as incompetent because the supporting affidavit was defective, having been sworn and verified by different individuals, contrary to mandatory procedural requirements.
Source excerpt
The applicant demonstrated the existence of a prima facie case, risk of irreparable loss, and that the balance of convenience favors her. The court found that denying the injunction would cause her greater hardship than the respondents, justifying the grant of the injunction.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining dealings with disputed land in Bagamoyo pending determination of the main suit.
Applicants established a prima facie case regarding ownership of the disputed lands, demonstrated risk of irreparable loss if injunction is denied, and balance of convenience favors applicants. Therefore, injunction is granted restraining respondent from trespassing pending determination of the main suit.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the respondent from mortgaging or disposing of the applicants’ suit premises pending the main land case.
The High Court granted an interlocutory injunction preserving the applicant’s land title and possession pending determination of the main suit over ownership.
The application is incompetent for not being accompanied with an affidavit as required by law.
Source excerpt
Applicant met all conditions for interlocutory injunction as per Atilio vs. Mbowe; triable issues exist; balance of convenience favors applicant due to provision of health services and risk of irreparable loss.
Source excerpt
The High Court Land Division recorded the parties’ settlement and marked the injunction application settled out of court on the terms of their deed of settlement.
The application was fatally defective due to improper citation of the enabling provision of law, as the cited law was no longer applicable, rendering the application incompetent.
Source excerpt
Explore more
