Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The East African Court of Justice adopted its intervention ruling in this application, finding related intervention requests substantively identical and addressing consolidation later.
The IEBCK does not meet the threshold for intervention under Article 40 of the Treaty and Rule 59(4) of the Rules because its interest is not distinct from that of the Attorney General (2nd Respondent), its participation would duplicate arguments already before the Court, and it has not demonstrated a direct and indispensable interest in the proceedings. The preliminary objection on jurisdiction is dismissed as misconceived, as intervention is a procedural matter distinct from substantive jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal overruled a preliminary objection to receiving a copy of an intended intervention application, holding the filing method caused no prejudice.
The African Court dismissed Brahim Belguith’s application to intervene in Salaheddine Kchouk v. Tunisia, finding no sufficient interest and no basis for intervention.
The African Court held that Reckya Madougou could not intervene in the case because her interests were already represented by an ad litem mandate to the applicant.
The Court held that Reckya Madougou, having given a mandate ad litem to the main applicant, is not a third party to the proceedings. Her interests are already represented in the main application, and thus she cannot be admitted as an intervenor under Rule 61. The application for intervention is therefore inadmissible.
Source excerpt
The applicant does not meet the requirements for intervention as he lacks sufficient legal interest and neutrality; the request is not admissible under the Court's rules.
Source excerpt
The Appellate Division upheld the UTC Mall dispute, found the company had locus standi, rejected time-bar and jurisdiction challenges, and increased compensation to USD 1,000,000.
The African Court granted Mauritius leave to intervene in Bernard Anbataayela Mornah’s case, finding a sufficient legal interest based on decolonization and self-determination.
The African Court dismissed an application by individual Ogiek members to intervene at the reparations stage, holding that the Rules do not allow individual intervention.
Explore more
