Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appellant used excessive force in the altercation, negating the defence of self-defence. The trial court properly considered all evidence and the prosecution proved the offence of grievous harm beyond reasonable doubt. The appellate court found no merit in the grounds of appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence.
Source excerpt
The High Court convicted the accused of manslaughter, finding the death occurred during a fight and that malice aforethought was not proved.
The court found that although the accused killed the deceased by shooting her with an arrow, there was no proof of intent to kill. The evidence showed the accused was provoked and intoxicated, leading to a momentary loss of self-control. The killing was accidental, and the accused was incapable of forming the intent required for murder. Therefore, the charge was reduced to manslaughter.
Source excerpt
The accused intentionally killed the deceased by cutting her with a panga, causing fatal injuries; the prosecution proved all elements of murder beyond reasonable doubt, and the defences of self defence, provocation, and intoxication were not applicable.
Source excerpt
The High Court of Tanzania at Dodoma allowed a criminal appeal, quashing rape and unnatural offence convictions after finding the prosecution case unreliable.
The trial was fundamentally faulty due to the judge's improper influence on assessors and failure to direct them on vital points of law, rendering the proceedings a nullity and occasioning a miscarriage of justice.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought as required for murder. The appellant admitted the killing but not intentional killing, and the evidence showed a fight initiated by the deceased. The conviction for murder was quashed and substituted with manslaughter.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought as the appellant's statements, relied upon by the prosecution, did not establish intent to kill. The evidence showed a fight initiated by the deceased, and the appellant acted in self-defence under provocation and intoxication. Therefore, the conviction for murder was not sustainable and was substituted with manslaughter.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania dismissed a murder appeal, upholding conviction despite excluding improperly admitted reports, because witness evidence proved guilt.
The appellant's claim of self-defence was rejected due to lack of evidence of an attack by the deceased, and the evidence of intoxication was insufficient to negate malice aforethought. The conviction for murder was upheld as the appellant was found to have formed the requisite intent.
Source excerpt
Explore more
