Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Insurance law ultimate security tanzania limited vs maxinsurance tanzania limited 2022 tzhccomd 82 22 april 2022

ultimate security tanzania limited vs maxinsurance tanzania limited 2022 tzhccomd 82 22 april 2022

The insurer, having indemnified the insured, is entitled under the principle of subrogation to recover from the party responsible for the loss, even in the absence of direct contractual privity. The appellant security company owed a duty of care to the insured as a foreseeable third party beneficiary of the security contract. The limitation of liability clause in the security contract does not apply to the subrogation claim. The trial court correctly evaluated the evidence and was not biased.

  • Subrogation
  • Privity of contract
  • Duty of care
  • Limitation of liability
  • Third party beneficiary
  • Indemnity
Read case analysis
Transportation law qatar airways others vs george sokoine mwalingo 2021 tzca 3531 23 september 2021

qatar airways others vs george sokoine mwalingo 2021 tzca 3531 23 september 2021

The Court of Appeal held that baggage-loss liability was limited under the Montreal Convention 1999 because no special declaration of interest was made and no recklessness was proved.

  • Carrier liability
  • Limitation of liability
  • International carriage by air
  • Burden of proof
  • Compensation for lost baggage
  • Carrier-liability
Read case analysis
Contract law martin kasyanju vs emirates airlines 2011 tzhc 2051 28 november 2011

martin kasyanju vs emirates airlines 2011 tzhc 2051 28 november 2011

The Defendant airline's duty of care is limited by the contractual terms in the General Conditions of Carriage, which exclude liability for undeclared valuables. Plaintiff failed to declare the money and did not prove on a balance of probabilities that the loss occurred as alleged. No duty of care extended to the Plaintiff's undeclared money.

  • Breach of contract
  • Negligence
  • Duty of care
  • Limitation of liability
  • Carriage by air
Read case analysis
Transport law 19820218 TZHC Dar es Salaam

19820218 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The High Court held that section 46(1) of the Tanzania-Zambia Railway Act did not limit liability because the lost goods were not in the Second Schedule.

  • Common carrier liability
  • Limitation of liability
  • Breach of contract
  • Common-carrier-liability
  • Limitation-of-liability
  • Breach-of-contract
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.