Tanzania Case Law

M

Court

TANZLII

The application was dismissed because the applicants introduced new facts beyond those for which leave was granted, violating mandatory procedural rules. The evidence established that the 3rd Respondent became aware of the fraud on 30/03/2023, making the complaint timely. No denial of fair hearing or misallocation of burden of proof was found. The debarment penalty was properly imposed jointly due to the nature of the joint venture and power of attorney arrangement.

Source excerpt

• Judicial review
• Certiorari
• Mandamus
• Procedural compliance
• Right to fair hearing
• Burden of proof

Read case analysis

ako group limited vs attorney general others 2022 tzhc 3091 29 april 2022

Court

TZHC

The High Court granted Ako Group Limited leave to seek judicial review and suspended a debarment order for 45 days pending further proceedings.

• Judicial review
• Mandamus
• Debarment
• Public procurement appeals
• Suspension of administrative orders
• Judicial-review

Read case analysis

diamond motors ltd vs the central tender board another 2004 tzhccomd 59 19 november 2004

Court

TZHCCOMD

The High Court held that the non-operational Public Procurement Appeals Authority did not bar direct recourse to court, but leave for judicial review was ultimately refused.

• Judicial review
• Public procurement appeals
• Procedural irregularity
• Quasi-judicial powers
• Judicial-review
• Public-procurement

Read case analysis