Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court partly varied a damages award over a communication tower dispute, setting aside unproved special damages for repairs and health injuries.
High Court appeal over unauthorized ATM withdrawals: negligence against the bank was upheld, but awards for specific and punitive damages were set aside.
Claims for punitive, exemplary, exaggerated, aggravated, and general damages are not quantifiable in law and are awarded at the discretion of the court; therefore, they cannot be considered in determining the pecuniary jurisdiction of the High Court. The proper forum for the suit is the Magistrates' Court.
Source excerpt
The High Court partly allowed a civil appeal, setting aside punitive damages but upholding refund of an unlawful fine and damages after finding a valid village permit.
The High Court awarded the plaintiff compensation for stolen and damaged household goods, gave general damages, and dismissed a demurrage counterclaim.
The High Court had jurisdiction as the claim's pecuniary value was within its limits. Malicious prosecution was not established; the correct tort was unlawful confinement. Defamation was established due to the public accusation and arrest. The trial Judge erred in awarding excessive damages and punitive damages without justification. The damages were reduced to TZS 10 million for slander and TZS 5 million for unlawful confinement. Punitive damages and damages for malicious prosecution were set aside.
Source excerpt
The Plaintiff proved supply of goods and the Defendant's indebtedness. The contract provided for interest on overdue payments. The Plaintiff failed to prove loss of income for general damages and did not establish grounds for punitive damages. The Plaintiff is entitled to the principal sum, contractual and decretal interest, and costs.
Source excerpt
The Plaintiff proved supply of goods, the outstanding debt, and the contractual terms for interest. The Defendant admitted the debt and failed to pay due to financial crisis, not willful misconduct. The Plaintiff is entitled to the outstanding amount, contractual and decretal interest, and costs, but not general or punitive damages due to lack of proof and absence of bad faith.
Source excerpt
The High Court had jurisdiction as the claim's pecuniary value was within its limits. Malicious prosecution was not established; the respondent was subjected to unlawful confinement and defamation. The trial Judge erred in awarding damages for malicious prosecution and punitive damages, and the quantum of damages for slander was excessive given the limited publication. The respondent is entitled to TZS 10 million for slander and TZS 5 million for unlawful confinement, with no interest. The appeal is otherwise dismissed with costs.
Source excerpt
The Plaintiff failed to prove its claims for special and general damages as required by law. The delay in installation of meters was justified due to unresolved issues regarding the origin of materials, and both parties contributed to the delay. The Plaintiff did not prove that its image was tarnished or that the Defendant's letter was defamatory. The Defendant failed to prove its counterclaim for the value of materials. Both the Plaintiff's claim and the Defendant's counterclaim are dismissed with costs.
Source excerpt
Explore more
