Plaintiff failed to pay the full purchase price, voluntarily entered into termination agreement, and thus breached the contract; defendant did not breach the sale agreement.
The plaintiff failed to prove that the Specimen Signature Card was forged or that the withdrawal mandate was 'Two to sign'; no evidence established fraud or conspiracy between the first and second defendants; the plaintiff, as a co-director and guarantor, is jointly and severally liable for the overdraft, but is entitled to a grace period for repayment and a refund from the first defendant for the amount withdrawn without his consent.
Defendant breached the sale agreement by delivering a defective and stolen vehicle, failed to replace or refund, entitling Plaintiff to refund of USD 120,000, commercial and court interest, and costs; general damages not awarded due to lack of proof.
On appeal in a dispute over two cupboards, the High Court held the respondent was to blame for the delay and was entitled only to a refund of the amount paid.