boateng and others v republic of ghana 2020 afchpr 10 27 november 202
The Court lacks temporal jurisdiction because the alleged violations and enactment of relevant laws occurred before the Respondent State became party to the Charter and Protocol and deposited the Declaration. The acts were instantaneous, not continuing, and their effects ceased with implementation. Only the Republic of Ghana is properly before the Court as Respondent.
Source excerpt
- Right to property
- Indigenous rights
- Jurisdiction
- Temporal jurisdiction
- Compulsory acquisition
- Access to justice