Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal after finding the respondent took no essential steps to pursue the appeal within the prescribed time.
The secretary's participation in the tribunal's decision rendered the proceedings and decision illegal and void.
Source excerpt
The judicial review application was timely as leave was sought within 14 days, but the applicant failed to establish any ultra vires action or breach of natural justice by PPAA. The applicant was ineligible for the tender due to nondisclosure of a summary penalty order constituting a final judgment within the relevant period, as required by tender documents and procurement regulations.
Source excerpt
The respondent failed to take essential steps within the prescribed time after filing the notice of appeal, justifying striking out the notice under Rule 89(2).
Source excerpt
The High Court quashed a CMA award after finding the arbitrator wrongly re-determined a timeliness objection already dismissed by a previous arbitrator.
The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal after finding the respondent had not taken essential steps to lodge the appeal within the prescribed time.
The State violated the applicant's right to a fair trial by failing to provide free legal aid in a serious criminal case where the applicant was indigent, as required by Article 7(1)(c) of the Charter and Article 14(3)(d) of the ICCPR. Other alleged violations were not established as the applicant had opportunities to be heard, defend himself, and the national courts' evaluation of evidence and appellate review did not amount to denial of justice.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal after finding the respondent had not proved compliance with the rules needed to extend time for filing the appeal.
The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal after the respondent conceded procedural non-compliance. Costs were awarded to the applicant.
Non-compliance with mandatory procedural rules regarding service, timeliness, and written submissions renders the appeal incompetent and cannot be cured by invoking substantive justice provisions.
Source excerpt
Explore more
