Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Given the urgency and the need to maintain the status quo, and considering the lack of alternative accommodation for affected residents, the court found it appropriate to suspend the operation of the impugned government notice and eviction order pending determination of the application for leave to apply for judicial review.
Source excerpt
The Registrar acted beyond statutory powers by setting aside the trade union election; such authority is exclusively vested in the Labour Court under Section 53 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act. The Registrar's decision is therefore quashed and set aside.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted leave to seek judicial review over a government notice declaring village land grazing area, finding an arguable case, time, and standing.
The High Court upheld a conciliation agreement reached before the Insurance Ombudsman and dismissed a challenge alleging excess jurisdiction and breach of natural justice.
The High Court dismissed a leave application for judicial review over alleged boundary variation affecting Kikarara Village, finding no proof of actual variation or gazettement.
The High Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to a refusal of leave without pay and removal from the public service, finding fair hearing and no ultra vires conduct.
The application for review was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any error apparent on the face of the record. The appellate judgment was based on the finding that the claim was time-barred under Article 30(2) of the Treaty, and not on the merits. The grounds raised by the applicant were either misconceived, based on obiter dicta, or attempts to re-argue the appeal, which is not permissible under review jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
The application for review was dismissed because the Applicant failed to demonstrate any error apparent on the face of the record. The original claim was governed by Article 30 of the Treaty, making it time-barred, and the Applicant's grounds for review were either based on obiter dicta or constituted an attempt to re-argue the appeal, which is not permissible under review jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
The petition was struck out for incompetence because the petitioner failed to exhaust available alternative remedies, specifically judicial review and statutory appeals, as required by section 8(2) of BRADEA. The alleged contraventions were of statutory provisions and could be addressed by judicial review, not by constitutional petition.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed Mbinga Coffee Curing Co. Ltd’s appeal, holding the district court lacked jurisdiction over a tax dispute that belonged before the Tax Revenue Appeals Board.
Explore more
