Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed convictions for forgery and uttering a false document, and set aside consecutive prison terms.
The trial court's failure to record its order on amendment of charge and noncompliance with mandatory preliminary hearing requirements, including reading and signing the memorandum of agreed facts, constituted fatal irregularities warranting quashing and nullification of the affected proceedings.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed a criminal appeal challenging a High Court ruling that had upheld the DPP’s appeal on a notice of appeal filing-date dispute.
Conviction was based on unreliable visual identification and untendered exhibits; prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; trial court erred in relying on evidence not properly admitted and in ordering consecutive sentences.
Source excerpt
The conviction for corrupt transaction was not supported by evidence as the prosecution failed to prove the necessary elements. However, the offences of obtaining money by false pretence and uttering a false document were proved beyond reasonable doubt by the evidence of PW2, corroborated by documentary and expert evidence. Defects in the charge sheet did not prejudice the appellant and were curable. The chain of custody argument was unfounded as the document was properly traced. Failure to call certain witnesses or produce CCTV footage was not fatal as the evidence adduced was sufficient.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed the DPP’s appeal, quashed the no-case-to-answer acquittal, and remitted the matter for the respondent to defend the forgery charges.
With the cautioned statement expunged, prosecution evidence was insufficient to prove guilt; conviction cannot be sustained.
Source excerpt
Non-compliance with section 214(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act by the successor magistrate, specifically failure to record reasons for the change and to inform the accused of their rights, constituted a serious irregularity rendering the proceedings and judgment from 1/9/2016 onwards a nullity.
Source excerpt
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to object to the cautioned statement at the proper time, prosecution evidence including confession and corroborating witnesses proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and failure to call the donor as a witness did not prejudice the case.
Source excerpt
Conviction on counts relating to Claudio Rusimbi cannot stand due to absence of complainant's testimony and reliance on hearsay; conviction on counts relating to Kelvin Mahenge upheld based on direct evidence and corroborated expert testimony.
Source excerpt
Explore more
