Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure CIVIL APPLICATION NO 206 14 OF 2024 JEREMIAH SUMUNI KULINDWA 4 OTHERS VS

CIVIL APPLICATION NO 206 14 OF 2024 JEREMIAH SUMUNI KULINDWA 4 OTHERS VS

The application for extension of time is granted solely on account of apparent illegalities in the impugned consent order, including denial of right to be heard and issues regarding land size, time limitation, and locus standi, which are sufficient to warrant the exercise of discretion despite the applicants' failure to fully account for the delay.

  • Extension of time
  • Revision
  • Consent order
  • Illegality
  • Right to be heard
Read case analysis
Civil procedure jonathan chacha tyenyi vs said seif dibwe 2023 tzhc 23108 15 june 2023

jonathan chacha tyenyi vs said seif dibwe 2023 tzhc 23108 15 june 2023

The High Court adopted a registered deed of settlement, marked the miscellaneous application withdrawn, and treated the related appeal and trial case as amicably settled.

  • Deed of settlement
  • Withdrawal of application
  • Payment of debt
  • Consent order
  • Civil-procedure
  • Consent-judgment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure mtakuja kondo others vs wendo maliki 2013 tzca 354 29 july 2013

mtakuja kondo others vs wendo maliki 2013 tzca 354 29 july 2013

The Court of Appeal dismissed a stay application as time-barred, unsupported by security, and pointless because the disputed house had already been sold.

  • Stay of execution
  • Limitation period
  • Probate and administration
  • Security for stay
  • Consent order
  • Sale of property
Read case analysis
Civil procedure gabriel ruhumbika vs pendieton security international t ltd 2007 tzhc 61 19 october 2007

gabriel ruhumbika vs pendieton security international t ltd 2007 tzhc 61 19 october 2007

The application was incompetent because the applicant failed to cite the specific enabling provisions of section 5(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 43 of the Court of Appeal Rules, which is a prerequisite for the court to be properly moved. Non-citation of the relevant provisions is fatal and renders the application liable to be struck out.

  • Leave to appeal
  • Citation of enabling provisions
  • Time limitation
  • Consent order
  • Fraud
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.