Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The East African Court of Justice enlarged time for Uganda to file and serve its response, holding the delay was sufficiently explained and not deliberate.
The Court of Appeal struck out the appeal because the record remained incomplete and Rule 96(8) barred a further chance to file another supplementary record.
The Court of Appeal struck out the appeal as incompetent because the record omitted trial exhibits and no exemption was sought under Rule 96(3).
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to include mandatory documents in the record of appeal as required by Rule 96(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, and the law does not permit the appellant to cure such omissions by supplementary record after the prescribed period.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out this civil appeal because the record was incomplete, missing pages of the High Court proceedings and breaching Rule 96(1)(d).
The Court of Appeal struck out an application to amend a record of appeal, holding that adding a missing document is governed by Rule 96(6), not Rule 111.
The appeal was struck out as incompetent because the decree did not bear the same date as the judgment, violating mandatory procedural requirements.
Source excerpt
Rule 48(4) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, applies to service on parties to the proceedings, requiring service within 14 days. The applicants failed to serve the respondent within this period, rendering the application incompetent.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out a criminal review application because it cited revoked Court of Appeal Rules instead of the applicable 2009 Rules.
The Court of Appeal marked the appeal withdrawn after it had been listed for hearing and ordered the appellants to pay the respondents' costs.
Explore more
