Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court struck out a land suit after finding the plaint failed to sufficiently describe the disputed property and did not disclose a cause of action against the defendant.
The High Court quashed a land tribunal decision for inadequate land description and failure to visit the locus in quo to resolve boundary disputes.
Omission to disclose size of unsurveyed suit land in the plaint is fatal and renders the plaint incompetent for lack of sufficient description, thus absence of cause of action.
Source excerpt
The plaint was defective due to improper case classification and insufficient description of the suit land, failing mandatory requirements under Order VII, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a land appeal and quashed a tribunal decision, holding that the dispute land had not been sufficiently described, making the suit incompetent.
The description of the suit land in the application was insufficient to identify it as required by law, rendering the proceedings null and void.
Source excerpt
Failure to properly describe the suit property renders the plaint defective and the suit incompetent ab initio.
Source excerpt
The description of the suit land was too general and lacked boundaries, rendering the proceedings null and void as the subject matter was not sufficiently identified as required by law.
Source excerpt
The failure to provide a specific and definite description of the suit property in the plaint before the Trial Tribunal rendered the proceedings and decision null and void as per the requirements of Order VII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a land appeal, quashed DLHT proceedings, and set aside the judgment because the disputed land was not properly described.
Explore more
