residents of the mau forest complex represented by the centre for comparative and international law and institute for human rights and development in africa v rep
The complainants failed to submit evidence and arguments on admissibility within the stipulated period and did not apply for an extension. The Commission therefore lacks sufficient information to determine admissibility and finds no interest in prosecution, warranting strike out.
Source excerpt
- Eviction
- Land rights
- Admissibility
- Diligent prosecution