Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The trial court wrongly discharged the accused under section 225(5) of the CPA because the prosecution was not unable to proceed with the hearing; the discharge was therefore invalid and must be quashed and set aside. Proceedings after 13th February 2024, including those dated 30th May 2024 and 4th June 2024, are nullified due to procedural irregularities.
Source excerpt
The High Court refused a further adjournment in an old retried criminal case, invoked its inherent powers, dismissed the charge, and acquitted the accused.
The prosecution failed to produce witnesses despite repeated warnings and the accused had been in remand for an extended period. Granting further adjournment would violate the accused's right to a fair and speedy trial. There were no exceptional circumstances warranting acquittal, but the charge should be dismissed and the accused discharged to prevent indefinite detention.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Kahama discharged the accused after the DPP entered a nolle prosequi in a manslaughter case before plea and preliminary hearing.
The court allowed the prosecution's application for nolle prosequi due to technical problems, resulting in the discharge of the accused without barring future prosecution on the same facts.
Source excerpt
The prosecution exercised its statutory right to discontinue the case by entering nolle prosequi, resulting in the discharge of the accused.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that the district court wrongly acquitted the accused for delay alone and ordered the criminal case returned for trial before another magistrate.
The High Court held that the magistrate wrongly used Penal Code discharge provisions for Road Traffic Act offences and failed to enter a conviction on the guilty plea.
The Court of Appeal held that section 225(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act did not authorize discharge where no trial had commenced, and allowed the appeal.
Explore more
