Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The applicant is entitled to a Mareva Injunction restraining the respondents from demolishing or interfering with the disputed land until the statutory notice to sue expires, as all procedural requirements have been met and the respondents do not oppose the application.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Bukoba found a prima facie breach of an injunction and ordered the respondents to appear, with possible arrest, detention, and attachment measures.
The court held that since objection proceedings regarding the property are pending and the hearing date is imminent, maintaining the status quo would not cause undue injustice to the respondents. Therefore, the applicant's prayer for interim protection of the property was granted.
Source excerpt
The court held that, given the pending main suit over ownership and the ongoing generation of rental income from the disputed property, it is necessary to preserve the rental proceeds in an escrow account to protect the financial interests of both parties until the dispute is resolved.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted a temporary injunction in part, restraining disposal of company assets and interference with the status quo pending an unfair prejudice petition.
It is improper to grant an interim stop order suspending the respondent's operation at the stage of determining leave to apply for judicial review, as this would pre-empt the substantive application and undermine the procedural requirements for judicial review.
Source excerpt
Applicants demonstrated triable issue regarding land ownership, imminent irreparable harm from eviction, and legal impediment due to statutory notice. All conditions for Mareva injunction are satisfied.
Source excerpt
Justice requires respondents to wait for outcome of counter claim before exercising right to sell suit property; applicant may suffer irreparable loss if property is disposed before determination; balance of convenience favors maintaining status quo pending determination of related cases.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Moshi dismissed an application for temporary injunction in a probate dispute, finding no prima facie case, irreparable harm, or favorable balance of convenience.
The applicant established triable issues, risk of irreparable loss, and greater hardship if the injunction is withheld. No opposition was presented. The principles for granting a temporary injunction are satisfied.
Source excerpt
Explore more
