Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania dismissed a review application, holding that the challenged ground of appeal had already been considered and no manifest error was shown.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application to review its earlier land decision, holding the complaints were not manifest errors and had not shown denial of hearing.
The applicant failed to demonstrate any manifest error on the face of the record; his dissatisfaction with the judgment does not meet the threshold for review. The application is an attempt to re-litigate the merits, which is not permissible under the law governing review.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed a criminal review application, holding that the applicant showed no manifest error on the face of the record and sought an impermissible rehearing.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Tanzania Breweries’ review application, holding that the alleged error was not manifest on the record and the motion was a disguised appeal.
The grounds raised by the applicant do not constitute manifest errors on the face of the record, nor do they show deprivation of the right to be heard or lack of jurisdiction as required under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules. The application is an attempt to re-argue the case and does not meet the strict criteria for review.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application to review its earlier ruling, finding no manifest error on the face of the record and no denial of a hearing.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a review application, holding there was no manifest error, fraud, or denial of hearing in an oral service application made in court.
The applicant failed to demonstrate a manifest error on the face of the record; the alleged errors require re-evaluation of evidence and are not self-evident. The application seeks to re-open the merits of the appeal, which is not permissible under review jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for extension of time to seek review, finding a 15-month delay unexplained and the claimed review ground inadequately pleaded.
Explore more
