Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Human rights law doebbler v sudan communication 235 of 2000 2009 achpr 103 25 november 2009

doebbler v sudan communication 235 of 2000 2009 achpr 103 25 november 2009

The African Commission dismissed Dr. Doebbler’s complaint against Sudan, finding no proof of forced repatriation or other Charter violations against Ethiopian refugees.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Cessation clause
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Right to asylum
  • Due process
  • State responsibility
Read case analysis
Human rights law institute for human rights and development in africa v republic of angola communication 292 of 2004 2008 achpr 83 22 may 2008

institute for human rights and development in africa v republic of angola communication 292 of 2004 2008 achpr 83 22 may 2008

The African Commission found Angola responsible for mass expulsion, arbitrary arrest and detention, inhuman treatment, property loss, and denial of due process.

  • Mass expulsion
  • Arbitrary detention
  • Due process
  • Discrimination
  • Right to property
  • Right to work
Read case analysis
Human rights law african institute for human rights and development v guinea communication 249 of 2002 2004 achpr 59 7 december 2004

african institute for human rights and development v guinea communication 249 of 2002 2004 achpr 59 7 december 2004

The African Commission found Guinea violated refugee rights after a presidential speech allegedly triggered discrimination, violence, detention, rape, and forced return of Sierra Leonean refugees.

  • Non-discrimination
  • Mass expulsion
  • Non-refoulement
  • Right to dignity
  • Right to property
  • Right to life
Read case analysis
Human rights law union interafricaine des droits de lhomme and others v angola communication 159 of 1996 1997 achpr 6 11 november 1997

union interafricaine des droits de lhomme and others v angola communication 159 of 1996 1997 achpr 6 11 november 1997

Angola's mass expulsion of West African nationals was arbitrary, discriminatory, and denied the victims due process, violating articles 2, 7(1)(a), 12(4), 12(5), 14, and 18 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

  • Mass expulsion
  • Non-discrimination
  • Due process
  • Right to property
  • Right to family
  • Right to work
Read case analysis
Human rights law rencontre africaine pour la defence des droits de lhomme v zambia communication 71 of 1992 1996 achpr 8 31 october 1996

rencontre africaine pour la defence des droits de lhomme v zambia communication 71 of 1992 1996 achpr 8 31 october 1996

The African Commission held that Zambia’s mass expulsion of West Africans violated the Charter, including non-discrimination, fair hearing, and protection against mass expulsion.

  • Mass expulsion
  • Non-discrimination
  • Right to fair hearing
  • Exhaustion of local remedies
  • Mass-expulsion
  • Fair-hearing
Read case analysis
Human rights organisation mondiale contre la torture and others v rwanda communication 27 of 1989 communication 46 of 1991 communication 49 of 1991 communication 99 of 1993 19

organisation mondiale contre la torture and others v rwanda communication 27 of 1989 communication 46 of 1991 communication 49 of 1991 communication 99 of 1993 19

The facts as submitted and uncontested by Rwanda constitute serious or massive violations of the African Charter, specifically Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 12.3, 12.4, and 12.5, including arbitrary detention, summary execution, mass expulsion, ethnic discrimination, and denial of fair hearing.

  • Arbitrary detention
  • Summary execution
  • Mass expulsion
  • Refugee rights
  • Ethnic discrimination
  • Right to fair hearing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.