Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The petitioners were required by law to exhaust available statutory remedies, specifically judicial review, before instituting a constitutional petition. The failure to do so rendered the petition incompetent. The statutory provisions requiring exhaustion are mandatory, not discretionary.
Source excerpt
The requested provisional measures are identical to the merits of the application and would constitute a premature judgment; therefore, the Court will decide both provisional measures and merits together to ensure proper administration of justice.
Source excerpt
The Court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate urgency and real, imminent risk of irreparable harm, given the delay between the electoral decree and the application. Measures sought overlapped with prior judgments already ordering legislative and regulatory changes. Requests regarding the president's mandate and participation of opposition candidates were either matters for the merits or too vague. The Court thus rejected the request for provisional measures.
Source excerpt
The constitutional revision violated the principle of national consensus under Article 10(2) CADEG, rendering all related violations moot; the administrative prohibition on issuing official documents to persons not convicted violates presumption of innocence and equality; no violation found regarding access to effective remedy or right to peace and security.
Source excerpt
The composition of COS-LEPI did not provide sufficient guarantees of independence and impartiality, violating Article 13(1) of the Charter, Article 17(2) of CADEG, and Article 3 of the ECOWAS Protocol. Other alleged violations were not established or lacked evidentiary support.
Source excerpt
Explore more
