The prosecution failed to prove the offences of unlawful hunting, possession, and dealing in government trophy against the first, second, and third appellants beyond reasonable doubt; convictions based on retracted confessions without corroboration and on defective charges were unsafe; conviction under a repealed statute is a nullity; only the fourth appellant was proved to be in actual possession of government trophy and his conviction and sentence (with modification) were upheld.
The Court of Appeal allowed a criminal appeal, finding the identification evidence unsafe, the charge amendment procedurally improper, and the cautioned statement inadmissible.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania upheld a conviction for causing loss to a specified authority, finding the appellant’s drunken negligence led to loss of a firearm.