Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a conviction for unlawful possession of government trophies, and ordered the appellant’s immediate release.
The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to a broken chain of custody, lack of proper documentation, failure to call material witnesses, improper admission of exhibits, and violation of the appellant's right to a fair trial. The conviction and sentence cannot stand.
Source excerpt
Prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to broken chain of custody, improper admission and labelling of exhibits, failure to produce material evidence, and violation of fair hearing standards. Conviction and sentence cannot stand.
Source excerpt
The trial court lacked jurisdiction as the consent and certificate conferring jurisdiction were signed by an unauthorized person under the wrong statutory provision, rendering the proceedings a nullity. Given the presence of strong evidence, the interests of justice require a retrial rather than acquittal.
Source excerpt
High Court criminal appeal over wildlife offences. The court upheld the conviction, expunged one extrajudicial statement, and found possession and dealing proved.
The District Court lacked jurisdiction to try both economic and non-economic offences as the certificate of transfer was wrongly issued under section 12(3) EOCCA instead of section 12(4); further, the improper admission of documentary exhibits rendered the prosecution case insufficient, and a retrial would be unjust as it would allow the prosecution to cure its case defects.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Mwanza allowed a criminal appeal, finding the prosecution had not proved unlawful entry into Serengeti National Park or related wildlife offences beyond reasonable doubt.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against convictions for unlawful possession of government trophies, upheld the sentence, and expunged an improperly admitted caution statement.
The absence of an endorsed certificate of consent by the DPP in the proceedings is a fatal procedural irregularity, rendering the trial a nullity and necessitating a retrial.
Source excerpt
The High Court quashed criminal appeal proceedings for lack of endorsed DPP consent and certificate, and ordered a retrial.
Explore more
