Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Human rights law democratic republic of the congo v republic of rwanda application no 0072023 2024 afchpr 6 7 march 2024

democratic republic of the congo v republic of rwanda application no 0072023 2024 afchpr 6 7 march 2024

The African Court dismissed DRC’s request for expedited procedure, holding it could not abridge defence-related time limits, but listed the case for priority handling.

  • Expedited procedure
  • Right to effective remedy
  • Right to life
  • Right to dignity
  • Prohibition of torture
  • Right to liberty
Read case analysis
International law republique democratique du congo c republique du rwanda requete n0072023 2024 afchpr 6 7 mars 2024

republique democratique du congo c republique du rwanda requete n0072023 2024 afchpr 6 7 mars 2024

The Court rejected the request for expedited procedure because the respondent did not expressly waive its right to the 90-day response period, and the complexity of the case did not justify shortening the deliberation period. However, the Court decided to give priority to the examination of the application due to the seriousness of the alleged violations.

  • Expedited procedure
  • Right to effective remedy
  • Right to life
  • Right to dignity
  • Prohibition of torture
  • Right to education
Read case analysis
Human rights law lidho and others v republic of cote divoire application 0412016 2023 afchpr 21 5 september 2023

lidho and others v republic of cote divoire application 0412016 2023 afchpr 21 5 september 2023

The Respondent State violated Articles 4, 7(1)(a), 16, 24, and 9(1) of the African Charter by failing to prevent the dumping of toxic waste, inadequately investigating and prosecuting those responsible, failing to provide effective remedies and compensation to all victims, not ensuring adequate medical care and information, and not fully remediating the environmental damage. The State’s actions and omissions breached its obligations to respect, protect, and fulfil the rights to life, health, environment, information, and effective remedy. The compensation programme and remedial measures were…

  • Right to life
  • Right to health
  • Right to environment
  • Right to information
  • Right to effective remedy
  • Toxic waste dumping
Read case analysis
Human rights collectif des anciens travailleurs de la semico tabakoto v republic of mali 2020 afchpr 12 27 november 2020

collectif des anciens travailleurs de la semico tabakoto v republic of mali 2020 afchpr 12 27 november 2020

The African Court held it had jurisdiction over the application, but found it inadmissible because the Applicants’ representative lacked authority to act before the Court.

  • Right to health
  • Right to environment
  • Access to justice
  • Legal representation
  • Jurisdiction
  • Admissibility
Read case analysis
Human rights collectif des anciens travailleurs de la semico tabakoto c republique du mali requete no 0092018 2020 afchpr 12 27 novembre 2020

collectif des anciens travailleurs de la semico tabakoto c republique du mali requete no 0092018 2020 afchpr 12 27 novembre 2020

The application is inadmissible because the representative of the applicants did not have a valid mandate to represent them before the African Court; the Court is competent but the preliminary objection regarding representation is upheld.

  • Access to justice
  • Right to health
  • Right to environment
  • Judicial independence
  • Procedural representation
Read case analysis
Human rights the social and economic rights action center and the center for economic and social rights v nigeria communication 155 of 1996 2001 achpr 34 27 october 2001

the social and economic rights action center and the center for economic and social rights v nigeria communication 155 of 1996 2001 achpr 34 27 october 2001

The Nigerian government, by direct action and omission, violated the rights to health, environment, property, food, life, and adequate housing of the Ogoni people under the African Charter by failing to prevent and remedy environmental degradation, violence, and deprivation caused by oil operations and state security forces.

  • Right to health
  • Right to environment
  • Right to property
  • Right to food
  • Right to life
  • Right to adequate housing
Read case analysis
Human rights law social and economic rights action center serac and center for economic and social rights cesr v nigeria communication no 15596 communication 155 of 1996 2001 achp

social and economic rights action center serac and center for economic and social rights cesr v nigeria communication no 15596 communication 155 of 1996 2001 achp

The Nigerian government, through direct action and failure to regulate or prevent abuses by oil companies and security forces, violated the rights to health, environment, property, housing, food, and life of the Ogoni people under the African Charter by failing to respect, protect, promote, and fulfil these rights, and by facilitating or condoning acts that led to environmental degradation, destruction of property and food sources, forced evictions, and violence.

  • Right to health
  • Right to environment
  • Right to property
  • Right to food
  • Right to housing
  • Right to life
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.