REVISION APPLICATIONI NO
The applicant was denied the right to be heard before the CMA, rendering the proceedings and ruling a nullity. Furthermore, the applicant provided sufficient reasons for the delay, as he could not have referred the dispute to the CMA until the criminal proceedings and appeal were finalized. The CMA erred in dismissing the application for condonation without properly considering these factors.
Source excerpt
- Condonation of delay
- Right to be heard
- Employment termination
- Suspension pending criminal proceedings