CR
The appellant was properly convicted of theft by agent as he converted cattle entrusted to him for temporary use, and the compensation order was lawfully made under section 348(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, as the offence was not punishable by death and material loss was suffered. The oral agreement issue was a new factual matter not open for consideration on second appeal, and the claim of double punishment was misconceived as the compensation order is not a penal measure.
Source excerpt
- Theft by agent
- Compensation order
- Double jeopardy
- Evaluation of defence evidence
- Oral agreement
- Tort of conversion