Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The parties mutually agreed to settle all claims regarding Plot No. 41 Block 'C' Uhuru Street, Morogoro, with the Plaintiff relinquishing all rights and claims in exchange for monetary consideration and allocation of alternative plots, and the court recorded the settlement as a binding consent judgment.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that the plaintiff had no valid title to Plot No. 211 Block R, Kihonda, because the land had already been sold to the 1st defendant in 2002.
The High Court Land Division entered a consent judgment declaring the plaintiff owner of Plot No. 766 and ordering transfer, registration, and boundary adjustment.
Consent judgment in a land dispute over Plot No. 6, Block D, Ubungo District, adopting settlement terms including payment, title transfer, and withdrawal of claims.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal over trespass to land in an estate dispute, holding that the appellant failed to prove ownership or bona fide purchase.
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant had no title to pass to the 3rd respondent after the tribunal's attachment order, the tribunal correctly identified the property subject to execution, and both the appellant and 3rd respondent failed to prove that the property sold was different from the attached property. The tribunal's orders were lawful and intended to ensure execution of the decree.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a land appeal, holding that Zaria Seif Ally was the lawful owner of the disputed plots and that no valid transfer to the second respondent was proved.
High Court land appeal dismissed: the appellant failed to show good title, as the sellers had not fully paid or validly acquired transferable title.
Despite defects in the written contract, the evidence established on a balance of probabilities that the Plaintiff and 2nd Defendant entered into an agreement for sale of 7 acres, the Plaintiff paid the full purchase price and transfer fees, took possession, and developed the land with the Defendants' knowledge and without objection. The Plaintiff is thus the lawful owner of the 7 acres and entitled to transfer of title, injunction, damages, and costs.
Source excerpt
In an ex parte land dispute, the High Court held that the Registered Trustees of Mhubiri Church of God proved lawful purchase and are entitled to transfer of title.
Explore more
